Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-samples

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 07 September 2021 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084D03A1A74 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NXcHH_IU9dBX for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58E0E3A1A75 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E776300C5A for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:56:29 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id GOBW0zp-RQ-E for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:56:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5332300A48 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:56:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:56:26 -0400
References: <21B245D6-2E59-4D9D-B969-E59C387DAEFA@vigilsec.com>
To: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <21B245D6-2E59-4D9D-B969-E59C387DAEFA@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <94275FBE-DBCC-48DF-A7F0-CA85E8B17061@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/sPIh3jjEqXyPMcx3giEBQkeX5XA>
Subject: Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-samples
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 21:56:35 -0000

I have not seen anyone speak against moving this document forward.  That said, I would like to see more people voice support for it.

Russ


> On Aug 17, 2021, at 4:41 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> Title: S/MIME Example Keys and Certificates
> 
> Author: D.K. Gillmor
> 
> Datatracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-samples/
> 
> The PKCS#12 issue has been resolved, so as discussed in the LAMPS meeting at IETF 111, we are going to proceed to WG Last Call. Since many people are on vacation in August and it would be very helpful if several mail clients were tested with these samples, the WG Last Call will have a longer duration than normal. So the WG Last Call will run until Tuesday, September 7th. Please review the document and respond with any comments or concerns on the mail list.
> 
> For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
>  Russ
> 
>