Re: [lamps] The LAMPS WG has placed draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org> Mon, 26 February 2018 19:04 UTC

Return-Path: <jsha@eff.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56DE1270A7; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:04:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eff.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1qReXS8c0XE4; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:04:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.eff.org (mail2.eff.org [173.239.79.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B96A01201FA; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:04:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eff.org; s=mail2; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version: Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=NFAsEBavpI6uXBDInKGUATnjAxSRYofAQSjtcztbAvA=; b=SwAAmoV1ocW/rF5wQuFGMMoaIG E+LFxJ5aXXdrHEx5Acok4ayEpKI5rkYROopnBbyPYt7XaUGQzWqfyVKzEGrBPB0jUIr2mPthxqwXc hrcBDN2OmOYkKvtlJ1cQ9YEzT7v2XWzkgqzkgIQv8T4+/czEXjW7jO3a7v4XsUpjytGQ=;
Received: ; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:04:50 -0800
To: Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>, "lamps-chairs@ietf.org" <lamps-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification@ietf.org" <draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification@ietf.org>
References: <151950039671.13803.5548300357689455000.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <MWHPR14MB1376ABAA3A2ADE2383B90BF283C10@MWHPR14MB1376.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
From: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
Message-ID: <bb6b0378-2d5d-f0f1-4070-b8c506d4ec86@eff.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:04:50 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR14MB1376ABAA3A2ADE2383B90BF283C10@MWHPR14MB1376.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/svahIjlBABAx-7f2LLWqCeiW50U>
Subject: Re: [lamps] The LAMPS WG has placed draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 19:04:53 -0000

On 02/26/2018 06:46 AM, Tim Hollebeek wrote:
> the RFC 6844 grammar contradicts the examples.  Corey had an excellent
> proposed fix for this issue.  It should probably be incorporated.
I tried to incorporate changes based on the thread Corey started, but
wound up deciding it was better to have something to adopt sooner rather
than later. Definitely happy to continue to work on those changes in
parallel with the call for adoption. Assuming the draft gets adopted as
a WG work product, it's easy enough to land the changes on the WG draft.