Re: [lamps] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-02

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 06 November 2018 02:26 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52A412D4EA for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 18:26:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TLEML0GZS7Zt for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 18:26:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4559C1294D0 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 18:26:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8EBB300AA6 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:26:40 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Y_bOJb86l85t for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:26:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dhcp-8a9b.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-8a9b.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.138.155]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECEFF300A0A; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:26:37 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <ed17c0b3-3ec1-3cb2-f78b-09429cd4d5fe@eff.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 21:26:34 -0500
Cc: Rob Stradling <rob@sectigo.com>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6B04034D-0EF3-47F3-AF06-4B6B1692F15D@vigilsec.com>
References: <154137879900.31779.4598074243144707056.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <3f3a8c40-d01f-a35c-aefd-2cd0240b635b@sectigo.com> <ed17c0b3-3ec1-3cb2-f78b-09429cd4d5fe@eff.org>
To: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/tu-LOBbz_iDMuCi5QTYWZ43oSrY>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-02
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 02:26:46 -0000

Jacob:

Please post the update promptly.  That way, the area director will review the newest one.

Russ


> On Nov 5, 2018, at 7:22 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the fixes, Rob. I've incorporated these into my working copy on GitHub.
> 
> Russ, can you provide feedback on the next steps, process-wise? Should I go ahead and upload a -03 draft?
> 
> On 11/5/18 8:42 AM, Rob Stradling wrote:
>> On 05/11/2018 00:46, Russ Housley wrote:
>>> Russ Housley has requested publication of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-02 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the LAMPS working group.
>>> 
>>> Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis/
>> Sorry, I realize it's rather late in the day for these comments, so
>> please consider or ignore/reject them as you see fit:
>> 
>> 1. "Comodo Group, Inc" was never my employer.  My real employer, "Comodo
>> CA Limited", just changed its name to "Sectigo Limited".
>> https://github.com/jsha/caa-simplification/pull/2
>> 
>> 2. Typo: amount -> among.
>> https://github.com/jsha/caa-simplification/pull/3
>> 
>> 3. Section 4 says:
>>    "The search for a CAA record climbs the DNS name tree from the
>>     specified label up to but not including the DNS root '.' until CAA
>>     records are found.
>> What if a CAA lookup returns just a single record (that contains, for
>> example, an "issue" property)?  That wouldn't be a plurality of "CAA
>> records", and so (by that wording) ISTM that the tree climbing must
>> continue.  I think "...until a CAA Resource Record set is found" would
>> be a better description of what's intended.
>> Related to this, ISTM that "The search for a CAA record..." should be
>> "The search for a CAA Resource Record set...", since CAs must always
>> consider the full RRset.  For example, CAs should not consider an
>> "issue" property whilst ignoring an "issuewild" property in the same RRset.
>> https://github.com/jsha/caa-simplification/pull/4
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm