IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Draft addition of header protection to the LAMPS charter

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Sat, 12 January 2019 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89951130F80 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:57:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.19
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OA_K0g4LmEQC for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:57:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [162.247.75.118]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06C43130F91 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:57:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (ool-6c3a0662.static.optonline.net [108.58.6.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CB1DF99A; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 08:56:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 145E8201EE; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:29:50 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: "Hernâni Marques (p≡p project)" <hernani@pep-project.org>, spasm@ietf.org, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <0319e3b2-81b7-13af-df9e-436a15ee1074@pep-project.org>
References: <DC188C55-6FDE-4E64-9151-54815E96B50B@vigilsec.com> <87bm5hxdn0.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <1194C123-1234-4B86-8EC1-26CE577CAFDA@vigilsec.com> <BB06AD4F-5F6F-4986-9ADC-04B44E34D0DE@vigilsec.com> <87imyvcb3m.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <7DC69A08-3A4E-4D57-B490-179B8E4A411E@vigilsec.com> <0319e3b2-81b7-13af-df9e-436a15ee1074@pep-project.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:29:49 -0500
Message-ID: <875zuvc4zm.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/us5if-HHvlQ1C9FVOODKp7ZzQ7I>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Draft addition of header protection to the LAMPS charter
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 13:57:32 -0000

On Fri 2019-01-11 20:39:46 +0100, Hernâni Marques (p≡p project) wrote:
> --- BEGIN HM-1 ---
>
> 7. Update the specification for the cryptographic protection of email
> headers -- both for signatures and encryption -- to improve the
> implementation situation with respect to privacy, security, usability
> and interoperability in cryptographically-protected electronic mail.
> Most current implementations of cryptographically-protected electronic
> mail protect only the body of the message, which leaves significant room
> for attacks against otherwise-protected messages.
>
> --- END HM-1 ---

I'm fine with this text too.  Does anyone have an objection to HM-1?
can we move forward with working on the actual draft? :)

        --dkg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email