Re: [lamps] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig-09: (with COMMENT)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 18 September 2019 17:22 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81038120A8D for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8RQc-mFyWe_4 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15F57120B3B for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822BA300AEF for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:22:53 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id kkltYKtwFe3b for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:22:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (unknown [138.88.156.37]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 451BC300A81; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:22:51 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <156882712117.4491.239737047176506617.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:22:51 -0400
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>, LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>, Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BC7CB31F-5D52-439A-ADC1-4CC94C229122@vigilsec.com>
References: <156882712117.4491.239737047176506617.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/vLv7ip2lvljhim6wTHtYdd2rR4g>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 17:22:57 -0000

Warren:

I believe that -09 addresses the comments from Joe.  You will see that the Acknowledgements include Joe.

Russ


> On Sep 18, 2019, at 1:18 PM, Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig-09: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thank you for writing this, and thanks to Joe for the OpsDir review -- it has
> some useful comments to address.
> 
>