Re: [lamps] Moving caa-simplification to a WG document?

Jim Schaad <> Fri, 17 November 2017 23:16 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E81126B7F for <>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:16:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ad4D5b4Yws62 for <>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:16:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7420F120724 for <>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:16:51 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-us
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256;; s=winery; c=simple/simple; t=1510960609; h=from:subject:to:date:message-id; bh=96T56NhxegsU069h3ZiiZ/bleQ4mQAUiZiwBoaEYEBM=; b=Rlgikvug8iPlzVW/j/phNh4ex3PnzVN4RiNS/gJ6OwtJpNd1Y7QGNRlRAmt64/iM/Xx63npEmNb ewcWf6dnhxYginH7x1vQFyeZOxmfBR3lhVHcglg8pqcvGBmQq1n3nCr9nHOx3kbh7zHCrWyqmpD34 RmpRJvfgYPx3NkTMcKbD+nvv0/v/ErS64OyQLC3uQCgC5q8eAJ5V9gNXmy+EWG9VSw4CbsmyHo5Ua lVnIF+WKAuKPOI6eogB9RVnerzstGuLmSBq7rvub5sXFIbIdXxRWAWQuwwSXzSx5aHcwRKrHUqds2 nUxwrB9PViD+qSDtUjDq4B9hz85DNh51EHjQ==
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:16:49 -0800
Received: from Jude ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:15:40 -0800
From: Jim Schaad <>
To: 'Jacob Hoffman-Andrews' <>, 'Russ Housley' <>, 'SPASM' <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 07:16:41 +0800
Message-ID: <05df01d35ffa$2286d200$67947600$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQIKT1ORQjHotxRnkqBk8qQ7D2TY+aKrVJWg
X-Originating-IP: []
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Moving caa-simplification to a WG document?
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 23:16:53 -0000

There are three steps that need to be taken:

1.  We need to publish one of our current documents - this is now down
2.  We need to do a charter update - this is not necessarily a gating factor
on adoption but needs to get done.
3.  We need to do a formal WG adoption call.  This has been done informally
and my understanding is that this would be a pro-forma step as there is
support to do this.

All that however is not needed to make progress on the document in terms of
having discussions and getting the document published as a document that the
working group is looking at.  This would only be blocking when we get to the
point of wanting to do the final steps to get it published.  Unless you
think the document is ready now to publish none of this is currently
blocking progress.


-----Original Message-----
From: Spasm [] On Behalf Of Jacob
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2017 4:41 AM
To: Russ Housley <>om>; SPASM <>
Subject: [lamps] Moving caa-simplification to a WG document?

At the WG session at IETF100 we took a hum on standardizing the CAA
implementation that's current in production, i.e. the contents of
Currently that's published as an individual draft. What steps do we need to
take to turn that into a WG document so we can make progress towards an RFC?


Spasm mailing list