Re: [lamps] shepherd writeup: draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce/

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 18 May 2020 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC163A0905 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2020 10:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ksy3KKaEeH66 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2020 10:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30F953A08EA for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2020 10:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E78300B05 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2020 13:02:32 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 02Bl_7aVBxun for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2020 13:02:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-72-66-113-56.washdc.fios.verizon.net [72.66.113.56]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B8D4300A26; Mon, 18 May 2020 13:02:31 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <16418846-B43A-45E5-BB28-B89169AE6523@akamai.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 13:02:32 -0400
Cc: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D3785CC2-7AFB-49C4-BDF3-52C365A2B35D@vigilsec.com>
References: <79037008-09ED-4E31-BA8C-1DC4F24E1687@vigilsec.com> <16418846-B43A-45E5-BB28-B89169AE6523@akamai.com>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/vlxAb1_yAhv5H0X9mzwhc-1Cff8>
Subject: Re: [lamps] shepherd writeup: draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce/
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 17:02:38 -0000

Thanks for catching my failure to answer the proper question.  Now fixed:

(11) Identify any ID nits the Document Shepherd has found in this
document.  (See http://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits/ and the Internet-Drafts
Checklist).  Boilerplate checks are not enough; this check needs to be
thorough.

  IDnits reports:
  -- The draft header indicates that this document updates RFC6960, but the
     abstract doesn't seem to directly say this.  It does mention RFC6960
     though, so this could be OK.
  The Abstract includes "This document updates the RFC 6960".
  This warning seems to be the result of "the" or a missing period.

Russ

> On May 18, 2020, at 10:56 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Is the answer to #11 a non-sequiture?  (However you spell it.)
> 
> It also specifies a recommendation for minimum, is that worth mentioning?
> 
> 
> On 5/16/20, 2:21 PM, "Russ Housley" <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce/shepherdwriteup/
> 
>    Please review and comment.
> 
>    Russ