IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Proposed charter update regarding clarifications

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Tue, 20 August 2019 19:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1232120874 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HhKxyTWZ3oGR for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3069A120857 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB8D380BE; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:36:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8550CE82; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:37:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
cc: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <944A9935-0A08-45E2-BD97-C21BF9EE18CF@vigilsec.com>
References: <3DB1B550-26FA-4F93-8CFA-434C1F8811D1@vigilsec.com> <944A9935-0A08-45E2-BD97-C21BF9EE18CF@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <6530.1566329836.1@localhost>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:37:16 -0400
Message-ID: <6531.1566329836@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/x2cgWbypx6_b3a0Ps82qccz2lL8>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed charter update regarding clarifications
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:37:20 -0000

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
    > No many people have spoken.  I am assuming that is because many people
    > take time off in August.  Right now roughly as many people support this
    > addition as oppose it.  Please speak your mind.

I'm in favour.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email