Re: [lamps] WG Last call: draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 29 October 2018 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A47B131028 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X3WN69YkwoWj for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AE9F131027 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CE4300AA6 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 17:30:48 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id NQq3I9eOCbSI for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 17:30:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-71-178-45-35.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.178.45.35]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25EE0300523; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 17:30:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <9B060EFB-B2C8-407C-9CFC-CE11D8EC7B31@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1A9DA36C-4D43-4C30-A532-8EAFD7C38EDA"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 17:30:47 -0400
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR14MB1106CF89BEC31A9D837A3A5383F30@BN6PR14MB1106.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
To: Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>
References: <BN6PR14MB1106CF89BEC31A9D837A3A5383F30@BN6PR14MB1106.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/yl6S8J1nwPv0jQkZVYgQ6Z9AQRw>
Subject: Re: [lamps] WG Last call: draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 21:30:53 -0000

I was thinking this would be an Informational RFC.  If the WG would prefer it on the Standards Track, that is fine with me.  I'll resubmit with a change to the title page header if that is desired at the end of WG Last Call.

Russ


> On Oct 29, 2018, at 5:23 PM, Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> This is the LAMPS WG Last Call for “Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension” <draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-00>.
>  
> Please review the document and send your comments to the list by 12 November 2018.
> If no concerns are raised, the document will be forwarded to the IESG with a request for publication as Proposed Standard.
>  
> -Tim