IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-15: (with DISCUSS)

"Alexey Melnikov" <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> Thu, 08 August 2019 12:31 UTC

Return-Path: <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AECB1202E2; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 05:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.fm header.b=mCD0SoA2; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Bq8WMaXv
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T1oN6It75UF5; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 05:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30B071202AD; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 05:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7FB21FBA; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 08:31:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap1 ([10.202.2.51]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 08 Aug 2019 08:31:01 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to:cc :subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=PguwD1S98I2PiOAcXdFoAWzSzAM/EJk elJs/tAutZdU=; b=mCD0SoA2dF+Ovn6AsrAJSqKGkDi4iCKqILaTQXuIFwr6emN ueC0ryQtEcYAVs/2Ee3R89I4RC8lvc5zg/9s3+PmFKzIwQcGdtu/A8kTE84p3fTl MZnWfd0FGyZm7PRJkGXtgNfxbiJpIUS3E132eqiMTSO2IFVWLm8+E5D4Z3zy5yME DhDM5V5qO34vw2/sO9MaBRBG1okP0Gm0w/p/ICwLq/gfUkV6Aqsl7qP4ztlrzjk+ 4CejlgTIbdFSk3jirjPflGSHDDweTfoCijNcAijJiA6J92qLIO3eJBY/21OTkyRC bvls0nJ4YCKoBHxe9tnu3bB91qivEF3GIZuQ+Wg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=PguwD1 S98I2PiOAcXdFoAWzSzAM/EJkelJs/tAutZdU=; b=Bq8WMaXvvVAI7exiaArqT4 xCoKDWlU9wAefR4W6qQIxQSgIaCEAyTelF0naT5aECAA4hGnId+8SqO39S5syoWC 2mBC5adEr3monW5uSMGL6qdGmY9JrxojJj+yADGQDbp0UostezsqCvHGxSW5jYma AKD0xElDsDdP1bbfevgaZtFIyT4hRbjTr++W74XLq/ENOuPmDW0RToNRokI+jWm9 ZeASMOU0YX+ixAU85xGD29yvqzCnwRZME4dwQenCc+fSBgqIsppUCmM2aobWgRwn mjTZo/7roEMAdY9x4yIPkxRWQiFf+VpGBuBxwIiM1Gg+U12FBLryMMP51YDeF06Q ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:AxZMXTRYXXkfI0hnFLrleEpbyNUJWYzeG3z9aMvj9g-FCpk6-sc_vA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudduhedgheegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdetlhgv gigvhicuofgvlhhnihhkohhvfdcuoegrrghmvghlnhhikhhovhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrd hfmheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhho mheprggrmhgvlhhnihhkohhvsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrfhhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:AxZMXSuOJkgz3d2T-gI80abugXtxxowb7Vu9wYh060fPOFW3-Qh_uQ> <xmx:AxZMXbJrOq2izhHK2s1jIk4y9k2DHOoacYVWWU_C5ay-gBLNIXZDHQ> <xmx:AxZMXXkhfSs9SPRvghwXU1EBJVRGxO6WTC5shVWJ1T9_Ir-TxBiDBg> <xmx:BBZMXcHDT7WVJrFtkZUlcrP6ThPBWEepPFxe4B_yx8tSialrzI7Acg>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 87000C200A4; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 08:30:59 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.6-808-g930a1a1-fmstable-20190805v2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <eef4e1a2-2eea-41f6-8181-88e91c3f164d@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B3400EB1@marchand>
References: <156481532800.6108.1633834009578124669.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B3400EB1@marchand>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 13:30:34 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
To: "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes@ietf.org>, "lamps-chairs@ietf.org" <lamps-chairs@ietf.org>, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/z7mvP8YK6NizosvJtNOnkdr3JsQ>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-15: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 12:31:18 -0000

Hi Roman,

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019, at 5:50 AM, Roman Danyliw wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: iesg [mailto:iesg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexey Melnikov via
> > Datatracker
> > Sent: Saturday, August 3, 2019 2:55 AM
> > To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> > Cc: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes@ietf.org; lamps-chairs@ietf.org;
> > spasm@ietf.org; housley@vigilsec.com
> > Subject: Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-15: (with
> > DISCUSS)
> > 
> > Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-15: Discuss
> > 
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
> > paragraph, however.)
> > 
> > 
> > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> > 
> > 
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes/
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > DISCUSS:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > This is a fine document, but I have one quick question:
> > 
> > Values TBD1..TBD4 are not listed in the IANA Considerations section. Should
> > they be?
> 
> I don't think so.  This document and draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shakes both 
> need the same OIDs (but have no other dependence).  This latter draft 
> is with the RFC Editor and does register these OIDs.

Ok, I understand now.

>  The current text, 
> "[I-D.ietf-lamps-pkix-shake] [ EDNOTE: Update reference with the RFC 
> when it is ready ]", was intended to guide the editor to replace TBD1-4 
> the OIDs when ietf-lamps-pkix-shake got published.  However, in 
> re-reading the text now, the EDNOTE should actually read "Updated the 
> TBD1-2 reference when the RFC is published".

There are 2 places TBD1-2 and TBD3-4. But yes, something like that.

I read the current text as just an instruction to change the draft name to the corresponding RFC number, so clarifying it would be great.

> 
> Make sense?

Best Regards,
Alexey

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email