IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Call for adoption of draft-wallace-lamps-key-attestation-ext

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Sun, 28 August 2022 03:03 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786AEC1522D8 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 20:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JGD8FJPeU5Yi for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 20:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82c.google.com (mail-qt1-x82c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6AC6C14CF1F for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 20:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82c.google.com with SMTP id cb8so4039074qtb.0 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 20:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=z41J7Ekl/JBuMMfiwhgFlTwA8R0BO1tbHK8PQgdmfGo=; b=mkuiTCZBml7PiiUXF49G7C8/+QIBWh0R1JA8ecnLX/pkw4/0oC8qpOuGyNB9DXA4TD ptXF4qmdCoDMVPFu5Yx427Ufgf+A28RnyaxM7cEoeEVKsTWU/5yPtACwDG+YaqcYQPdr FAc//0ozkVhNIRjhcJf+7i1dacpC+Vo5D8dtU=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=z41J7Ekl/JBuMMfiwhgFlTwA8R0BO1tbHK8PQgdmfGo=; b=3TL7/4CQiOIvhc5Q/GBXuKSsR7IOdP1NotJz8uzgLdThVyUpEpcujU43KB65Agrlf+ tSfR9c7oh4G9DCGcPSnXZ9MTQ0M976wcVd1JvGN5+oi9m2SM+AATy2DV+83CY1q7PAMU 6nmpxqXlrg3TmFfO7BMHFZqle69E8lTl9sh2wGw/5jtmUtb/HgmQq+K8SD6tCL83ZALn O48JQK/C4QDBfcFZsQB/bM2KPv+J/G/6E+P1hbAUSgcix2odLY88YbTHbVEotEewczBf zaI6zGulLhLuqfTG/wPhARtmbJ49Q5iiPKokoJt5zpLFTc76zbWMUDaLaHVohbtvuxqE 1+Rg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2NBkmMhr1qOQruIdV8HPwR9wnCqyaUgybMBpijdNGnU+o9I8g9 8GU7VNu+VD5XotDu4ni39JFTiurlZRXLLg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5GqW5I5KSbqR9FrlSTvQrJueMc1EptOjF2dp6dDxje/3xeyegzg34YJFjh36itT+5+JhZ3IQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:54c:b0:343:5a1a:9ace with SMTP id m12-20020a05622a054c00b003435a1a9acemr5426094qtx.546.1661655779607; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 20:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2600:4040:253b:7300:d9ac:1181:2a64:9fdd]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s18-20020a05620a255200b006bbc09af9f5sm3221473qko.101.2022.08.27.20.02.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 27 Aug 2022 20:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <6659A453-E68C-453E-A269-DC709F559949@vigilsec.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 23:02:58 -0400
Cc: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <119F376A-1B0D-4DB1-872C-A8BEA0D40520@sn3rd.com>
References: <PH0PR00MB10003EC6A096FE0A363BBFB9F5459@PH0PR00MB1000.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <PH0PR00MB10002A7A2850A1333B4F6C00F54A9@PH0PR00MB1000.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <6659A453-E68C-453E-A269-DC709F559949@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/zSUP6XbsxEUmMJY7WdrQBtAir4Q>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption of draft-wallace-lamps-key-attestation-ext
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 03:03:04 -0000

Totally biased, but I would like to see the WG adopt this I-D.

Cheers,
spt

> On Aug 27, 2022, at 11:24, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> There has been some discussion of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wallace-lamps-key-attestation-ext/.  During the discussion at IETF 114, we agree to have a call for adoption of this document.
> 
> Should the LAMPS WG adopt “Key Attestation Extension for Certificate Management Protocols” in draft-wallace-lamps-key-attestation-ext/-01?
> 
> Please reply to this message by Monday, 12 September 2022 to voice your support or opposition to adoption.
> 
> On behalf of the LAMPS WG Chairs,
> Russ
> 
> 
> P.S.  This is a retransmission of the message from earlier today.  The correct subject line was used this time...
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm

v2.38.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status