IETF Logo Mail Archive

[spb-isis] SPB interop - Stable at 187 nodes with ALU now in the network

Peter Ashwood-Smith <Peter.AshwoodSmith@huawei.com> Thu, 30 June 2011 01:16 UTC

Return-Path: <Peter.AshwoodSmith@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: spb-isis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spb-isis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D50621F8571 for <spb-isis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.319
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.319 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.280, BAYES_00=-2.599, DC_IMAGE_SPAM_HTML=0.001, DC_IMAGE_SPAM_TEXT=0.001, DC_PNG_UNO_LARGO=0.558]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Fo2Jy5vc8pn for <spb-isis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:16:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usaga01-in.huawei.com (usaga01-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.211]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7517B21F8570 for <spb-isis@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:16:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (usaml01-in [172.18.4.6]) by usaga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LNK00DY7WVCF6@usaga01-in.huawei.com> for spb-isis@ietf.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:16:24 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from LapPSmith ([72.1.197.186]) by usaga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LNK00D1MWVAEZ@usaga01-in.huawei.com> for spb-isis@ietf.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:16:24 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:16:22 -0400
From: Peter Ashwood-Smith <Peter.AshwoodSmith@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <00ce01cc3698$f4f07530$df872f0a@china.huawei.com>
To: spb-isis@ietf.org, 'Stephane Vinet' <stephane.vinet@empowerednetworks.com>
Message-id: <00fa01cc36c3$5376a9b0$df872f0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3664
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_wDHJ6J3vJ4IVOU7V3utmZg)"
Thread-index: Acw1EjtzZcSwj3hbSr6x/xQD/Tlr+gAr7qHwAATZ8WAAMFp1cAAK4mVw
Subject: [spb-isis] SPB interop - Stable at 187 nodes with ALU now in the network
X-BeenThere: spb-isis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The members of this list will discuss the requirements, functionality and extensions to ISIS to support 802.1aq." <spb-isis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spb-isis>, <mailto:spb-isis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spb-isis>
List-Post: <mailto:spb-isis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spb-isis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spb-isis>, <mailto:spb-isis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 01:16:26 -0000

The network should be accessible by telnet about 9:30pm EDT to about 9:00am
EDT at address/userid/password provided previously.

Currently stable at 186 nodes. EG:

<ottawa-s9300-6> d spb status
SPB Status:
    mode SPBM, nodes 187, links 412, adj 6, ufib 372, mfib 45
    Collision:

The ALU switch is in the network called 'omniswitch' and is now advertising
ISIDs correctly and transit unicast and multicast appears correct.

The routing seems ok but its hard to tell with such a big network. Here is a
route crossing three vendor switches.

<ottawa-s9300-6>d spb uroute omniswitch s9303-1 vlan 40
PATH:
  omniswitch -> ERS-6 -> s9303-6 -> s9303-1

Picture attached, ignore red status on links which I think is incorrect. 

Peter/John/Edgard/Stephan






-----Original Message-----
From: spb-isis-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:spb-isis-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Peter Ashwood-Smith
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 4:55 PM
To: spb-isis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spb-isis] SPB interop - 92 nodes 212 links ..


Just finishing up for today. Stable at 91 nodes. 
We experimented around with different link metrics and the BridgePriorities
today.

Noted some problems with metric displays and honoring of BridgePriorities

Will send static IP information to those of you doing development so you can
log on to your switches tonight.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: spb-isis-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:spb-isis-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Peter Ashwood-Smith
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 2:38 PM
To: spb-isis@ietf.org
Subject: [spb-isis] SPB interop - 92 nodes 212 links ..


SPB Status:
    mode SPBM, nodes 91, links 212, adj 5, ufib 180, mfib 28

Waiting for ALU .. hopefully tomorrow?

Peter

_______________________________________________
spb-isis mailing list
spb-isis@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spb-isis

_______________________________________________
spb-isis mailing list
spb-isis@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spb-isis

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email