[Speermint] RFC 6404 on Session PEERing for Multimedia INTerconnect (SPEERMINT) Security Threats and Suggested Countermeasures
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Sat, 05 November 2011 01:33 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: speermint@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: speermint@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FE011E8073; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 18:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.57
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cgrMRFY0aRsl; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 18:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D9741F0C61; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 18:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id EA4FC72E00C; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 18:29:13 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20111105012913.EA4FC72E00C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 18:29:13 -0700
Cc: speermint@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Speermint] RFC 6404 on Session PEERing for Multimedia INTerconnect (SPEERMINT) Security Threats and Suggested Countermeasures
X-BeenThere: speermint@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the speermint working group <speermint.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/speermint>, <mailto:speermint-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/speermint>
List-Post: <mailto:speermint@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:speermint-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speermint>, <mailto:speermint-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 01:33:47 -0000
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 6404 Title: Session PEERing for Multimedia INTerconnect (SPEERMINT) Security Threats and Suggested Countermeasures Author: J. Seedorf, S. Niccolini, E. Chen, H. Scholz Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: November 2011 Mailbox: jan.seedorf@nw.neclab.eu, saverio.niccolini@.neclab.eu, eric.chen@lab.ntt.co.jp, hendrik.scholz@voipfuture.com Pages: 22 Characters: 54066 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-speermint-voipthreats-09.txt URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6404.txt The Session PEERing for Multimedia INTerconnect (SPEERMINT) working group (WG) provides a peering framework that leverages the building blocks of existing IETF-defined protocols such as SIP and ENUM for the interconnection between SIP Service Providers (SSPs). The objective of this document is to identify and enumerate SPEERMINT- specific threat vectors and to give guidance for implementers on selecting appropriate countermeasures. Security requirements for SPEERMINT that have been derived from the threats detailed in this document can be found in RFC 6271; this document provides concrete countermeasures to meet those SPEERMINT security requirements. In this document, the different security threats related to SPEERMINT are classified into threats to the Lookup Function (LUF), the Location Routing Function (LRF), the Signaling Function (SF), and the Media Function (MF) of a specific SIP Service Provider. Various instances of the threats are briefly introduced inside the classification. Finally, existing security solutions for SIP and RTP/RTCP (Real-time Transport Control Protocol) are presented to describe countermeasures currently available for such threats. Each SSP may have connections to one or more remote SSPs through peering or transit contracts. A potentially compromised remote SSP that attacks other SSPs is out of the scope of this document; this document focuses on attacks on an SSP from outside the trust domain such an SSP may have with other SSPs. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes. This document is a product of the Session PEERing for Multimedia INTerconnect Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html. For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html. Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC