Re: [spfbis] WGLC: draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14

["Murray S. Kucherawy" <[e-mail]>]

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Scott Kitterman <[e-mail]> wrote:

> >  The hostname is generally the identity used in the 5321.HELO/.EHLO
> >  command.  In the case of messages with a null 5321.MailFrom, this is
> >  used as the domain for 5321.MailFrom SPF checks, in addition to being
> >  used in 5321.HELO/.EHLO based SPF checks.  The standard SPF record
> >  for an individual host that is involved in mail processing is:
> >
> > At least, for uniformity with the rest of the document, replacement of
> > the terms defined in Sections 1.1.3 and 1.1.4 ought to be done.  The
> > term "hostname" is used once more in the I-D, and I propose a
> > replacement it in order to make the text smoother in Section 10.1.2.
> >
> > Please do what you think is better.  Thank you for editing.
>
> I think hostname is sufficiently standard that it's OK to use there and
> appropriate because we're generally referring to the name of and individual
> host and not a domain that may have multiple hosts.
>
> Any other opinions?
>

I'd like to see something in OLD vs NEW form before I could say for sure,
but generally I think I agree.