[spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (6433)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 17 February 2021 09:36 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841AA3A1889 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 01:36:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ucqhad9tp1Nu for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 01:36:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68D313A1888 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 01:36:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 16102F40759; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 01:36:43 -0800 (PST)
To: scott@kitterman.com, superuser@gmail.com, barryleiba@computer.org, sm+ietf@elandsys.com, ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: me@kasparetter.com, spfbis@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210217093643.16102F40759@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 01:36:43 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/3-IYwglLuxr8t-UQMevUm4pJXBc>
Subject: [spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (6433)
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spfbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 09:36:48 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7208, "Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6433 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Kaspar Etter <me@kasparetter.com> Section: 3 Original Text ------------- Each SPF record is placed in the DNS tree at the owner name it pertains to, not in a subdomain under the owner name. This is similar to how SRV records [RFC2782] are done. Corrected Text -------------- Each SPF record is placed in the DNS tree at the owner name it pertains to, not in a subdomain under the owner name. This is different from how SRV records [RFC2782] are done. Notes ----- SRV records are placed at specific subdomains, which is not the case for SPF records. (I've chosen Editorial instead of Technical because the meaning of this paragraph should be clear from the context and thus this feels more like a typo.) Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7208 (draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-21) -------------------------------------- Title : Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1 Publication Date : April 2014 Author(s) : S. Kitterman Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : SPF Update Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (643… RFC Errata System