Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5550)

"Stuart D. Gathman" <stuart@gathman.org> Fri, 09 November 2018 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <SRS0=GDzSC=NU==stuart@gathman.org>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FF4129619 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 11:35:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gathman.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ZQYlguGKhm4 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 11:35:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.gathman.org (mail.gathman.org [IPv6:2001:470:8:809::1010]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D93A112008A for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 11:35:47 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: mail.gathman.org; auth=pass (plain sslbits=256) smtp.auth=stuart
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gathman.org; i=@gathman.org; q=dns/txt; s=default; t=1541792114; h=date : from : subject : to : cc : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : date : from : subject; bh=oa04+wTN5QEjCu7CA9If1oUjgAvvwpIwoEov18OOIeA=; b=E/quS4EgZLdOnIusYtCEZAOb3rffJ7/PnlIsQ1jvZC0arLDoTvYJ76qE 6m28T5vvz8BhigK6zVC6cs9R6uWqhpw5eRoFAXT+Fc8kwLCfS2P/E3BTGH OFfQQxyY9X9OjHR1Bk7XUOB4YFRIW9208Snok0gikfeoQLSHNXB5NckzQ=
Received: from elissa.gathman.org ([IPv6:2001:470:8:809::109f]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.gathman.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id wA9JZDcB029839 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 14:35:14 -0500
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 14:35:15 -0500
From: "Stuart D. Gathman" <stuart@gathman.org>
To: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, ben@nostrum.com, adam@nostrum.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, sm+ietf@elandsys.com, ajs@anvilwalrusden.com, spfbis@ietf.org, dear.friend@2die4.com
Message-Id: <1541792115.6280.1@mail.gathman.org>
In-Reply-To: <2394369.44pl4s8oyQ@kitterma-e6430>
References: <20181109165920.AF8B2B810A6@rfc-editor.org> <2394369.44pl4s8oyQ@kitterma-e6430>
X-Mailer: geary/0.12.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-EzUCpuOV6qUfzHfGxez9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/6vurBaf0Rk4lNTyrH5I6-NsUT7U>
Subject: Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5550)
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spfbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 19:41:52 -0000

+1  Scott K stated it well.  I was going to write something similar.  I 
use an implicit default record of "v=spf1 a" for HELO, which also 
simply gives a neutral result in the case he is concerned about,

On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>; 
wrote:
> My recommendation is that the errata be rejected.
>