IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] The RRTYPE topic (was: WGLC: draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 29 May 2013 23:56 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775D821F8B2B for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2013 16:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RB6f2DKkH4Yr for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2013 16:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x234.google.com (mail-pb0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A1321F8B04 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 May 2013 16:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f52.google.com with SMTP id um15so9932366pbc.25 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 May 2013 16:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=B0+DU+24qR+haMcS5bms2cju0NBRThYr+pTmtBcvJXc=; b=BaUo3CoTqM5o3mJWA52+LIbqyHEEyW7ikJeNIvi4IBGwlO8lq0zQ6n/VvN73RrbAG7 D7zpbq4rLWYyI5ZBOHzyk5Wl8nPXR6sW2YHUqcU6JLzgMf+l1G0mwTpnm+KbHeSz5pxO UhU/7hs6h3a68pQoCrHhUFrDMnT5eWa/sOeGIWB1Bku8hC1IonVuQGlVI5+YKil9dryb Jou07P7269l2uTqlkK+Q9Sf+FMoKiiBH9H2xQt25IimGU6xEiMFzU2W7kN+9beS80oZm 2RD0BOF5C4sRWwYHBVbnfuds/N7oHNpljx/b67HLsOscHOhSvQQxMnE/S7rZ7c4rpVS/ Ws+Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.126.11 with SMTP id mu11mr5606228pab.81.1369871783595; Wed, 29 May 2013 16:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.234.2 with HTTP; Wed, 29 May 2013 16:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130529220822.2326134DBF6E@drugs.dv.isc.org>
References: <A022755E-F8B8-4C82-9F1C-73B8585193BF@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130528130858.0db81cd0@resistor.net> <CAL0qLwan7JO4t2UB1uWYwwf1MmwhY56szenSY7awT_pNP5UjLg@mail.gmail.com> <B6A88D56-9318-40A3-8E0C-A49EE37A3F3F@gmail.com> <20130529143635.GZ23227@verdi> <CD0B53CE-E90E-4296-B724-0749361D7626@gmail.com> <20130529202145.GA9506@mx1.yitter.info> <20130529212602.5909734DBABF@drugs.dv.isc.org> <20130529214234.GB9584@mx1.yitter.info> <20130529220822.2326134DBF6E@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 16:56:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwa2Eh_tbSHCULhUGALf_hNOmOW01HA6pPgVPfDK2YMEhA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="485b395e7de70c954704dde421e1"
Cc: "spfbis@ietf.org" <spfbis@ietf.org>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Subject: Re: [spfbis] The RRTYPE topic (was: WGLC: draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14)
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 23:56:24 -0000

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:

> The working group has created two new unaddressed issue by going the TXT
> only.
>
> * how to get people who fielded only SPF records to move to TXT records
> * how to deal with the confusion of a SPF record that isn't to be used
>   for SPF.
>
> Neither of those issues are currently addressed.
>
>
To the first point: If we go in the opposite direction and deprecate use of
TXT for SPF, the community of people that needs to update is vastly
larger.  How is that the better solution?

I don't understand what you mean by the second thing.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email