IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-05

Scott Kitterman <spf2@kitterman.com> Mon, 23 April 2012 15:00 UTC

Return-Path: <spf2@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB3F21F85AE for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.583
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.583 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.016, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2zhNsLHpha-p for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (mailout02.controlledmail.com [72.81.252.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3FBF21F859F for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499A820E40E3; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:00:56 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=2007-00; t=1335193256; bh=WtEDk0B2CdtkerpShPCDlcKI9qmvv9zFWPZ3HQDWqOs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type; b=TLERNkRjBPpOzJn2HY69s8fEz7TJmbssEB5L8aGpk2KakRZ2HJY8L6Ix/lXeB9Jwy G3OGWByfkeZBFnJ9niL9QztT25O+g57r6wBg9JOBxyLurAHjq1E3abSYQZh+q6akKP szEW1N6OX4AfDxNY9y1eCA6fbIQERwqDs42lUWN0=
Received: from scott-latitude-e6320.localnet (static-72-81-252-21.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DE6F20E408E; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:00:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <spf2@kitterman.com>
To: spfbis@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:00:56 -0400
Message-ID: <63583111.FeGGmhBaS4@scott-latitude-e6320>
User-Agent: KMail/4.8.2 (Linux/3.2.0-23-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.2; i686; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20120423145947.GH55520@mail.yitter.info>
References: <CAC4RtVAV5PH+VMzppVxAQgGq0f28ARN846e17G_8sbLCThm-KA@mail.gmail.com> <3365685.ptXhF5PY8S@scott-latitude-e6320> <20120423145947.GH55520@mail.yitter.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-05
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:00:58 -0000

On Monday, April 23, 2012 10:59:51 AM Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> No hat.
> 
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:51:49AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I think it's highly relevant to how the data on usage is interpreted.
> 
> How?  I don't see it.  If you're arguing for inclusion, the burden of
> proof is on you.

No.  I'm arguing that the current text remain.

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email