Re: [spfbis] Proposed spf TXT record change

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 10 February 2016 02:25 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A541B3595 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 18:25:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.863
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.863 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, KHOP_DYNAMIC=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t6-Az1vAiLqi for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 18:25:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D17031B3590 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 18:25:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 69133 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2016 02:25:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 10 Feb 2016 02:25:47 -0000
Date: 10 Feb 2016 02:25:25 -0000
Message-ID: <20160210022525.98482.qmail@ary.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: spfbis@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <56BA775B.9050109@ragged-software.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/HFS7Vr3izQDeVUgVP8Kutopi6BQ>
Cc: rag@ragged-software.com
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Proposed spf TXT record change
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spfbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:25:50 -0000

> I think the spf information should be placed in a TXT record
>attached to a _spf selector (e.g. _spf.example.com).

You're right, but you're also a decade too late.  Forget it.

R's,
John