Re: [spfbis] WGLC: draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14

Tim Draegen <tim@eudaemon.net> Wed, 17 April 2013 02:10 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@eudaemon.net>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D38721F93BA for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.766
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.766 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.167, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zYB4jCVDobf0 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pie.eudaemon.net (pie.eudaemon.net [72.250.241.194]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39D621F8EBB for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.7] (sctv-72-100.mounet.com [216.145.72.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pie.eudaemon.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1BA5CB46; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 22:10:37 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Tim Draegen <tim@eudaemon.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ4XoYd2r7=Vd3Ge4JZie=Hz6+JupDR-OkuSRzRkyuk+5KHrKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 22:10:02 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7FE87BAF-B202-4CD5-B7BA-EDABE151E142@eudaemon.net>
References: <20130409062431.GK24624@mx1.yitter.info> <CAJ4XoYd2r7=Vd3Ge4JZie=Hz6+JupDR-OkuSRzRkyuk+5KHrKA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: spfbis@ietf.org, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Subject: Re: [spfbis] WGLC: draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 02:10:01 -0000

On Apr 16, 2013, at 10:08 PM, Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've reviewed the draft and have one "nit" and one question/comment:
> 
> In the Abstract the use of ADMD should be followed with
> (ADministrative Management Domains)
> 
>   Email on the Internet can be forged in a number of ways.  In
>   particular, existing protocols place no restriction on what a sending
>   host can use as the "MAIL FROM" of a message or the domain given on
>   the SMTP HELO/EHLO commands.  This document describes version 1 of
>   the Sender Policy Framework (SPF) protocol, whereby an ADMD can
>   explicitly authorize the hosts that are allowed to use its domain
>   names, and a receiving host can check such authorization.

Oh dude!   Get out of my head!   I'm reviewing the document (about 5 minutes in) and this was my first note!