IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] WGLC: draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14

Scott Kitterman <spf2@kitterman.com> Wed, 29 May 2013 02:53 UTC

Return-Path: <spf2@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF26621E8082 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2013 19:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KmFPYNAENI2m for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2013 19:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (mailout02.controlledmail.com [72.81.252.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53D721F8B27 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 May 2013 19:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D53420E40D6; Tue, 28 May 2013 22:52:55 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=2007-00; t=1369795975; bh=0qhcD+giA+6bwyLpa3M0EyOocMHCocfTLe/Fy3GrB0I=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=n1dvCoGsGtpkMfe90Epl3LBOsxCa5TYMaKpyCV0a7JZVigG+6a8pXjrU9Vozgd6Vg 1wlhyHUusFsM9vbR6NZMKI/6q6gvqUgkEiPU8M2oJWdxk3rMUOI52wlczzjGD5G3gq Umixlit7S05xER894IZYrBCGqI8V7hzQMxaoHJ/U=
Received: from scott-latitude-e6320.localnet (static-72-81-252-21.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F91C20E40CF; Tue, 28 May 2013 22:52:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <spf2@kitterman.com>
To: spfbis@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 22:52:53 -0400
Message-ID: <21746052.2ftQxjEWaI@scott-latitude-e6320>
User-Agent: KMail/4.10.2 (Linux/3.8.0-22-generic; KDE/4.10.2; i686; ; )
In-Reply-To: <51A55D2F.3010202@dcrocker.net>
References: <A022755E-F8B8-4C82-9F1C-73B8585193BF@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwan7JO4t2UB1uWYwwf1MmwhY56szenSY7awT_pNP5UjLg@mail.gmail.com> <51A55D2F.3010202@dcrocker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Subject: Re: [spfbis] WGLC: draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 02:53:16 -0000

On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 03:43:11 AM Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 5/28/2013 11:15 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> > Overall, I don't think this draft introduces any new material such that
> > the WG needs to revisit anything since WGLC closed.
> 
> +1
> 
I've reviewed the document and the revision and I concur.

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email