IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Updated charter - final review

Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net> Fri, 03 February 2012 19:21 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19F421F8505 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 11:21:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.703, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gKtQVWcHCz+e for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 11:21:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB92521F851E for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 11:21:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.22.16.112] ([68.65.169.138]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q13JLh5t027181 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 11:21:49 -0800
Message-ID: <4F2C33C1.50807@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:21:37 -0800
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: spfbis@ietf.org
References: <4F28DBB7.5070101@qualcomm.com> <4F29E395.3020100@mail-abuse.org> <5905d04c-42eb-42f0-b580-1fb654cfe5af@email.android.com> <4F2A11E7.10409@mail-abuse.org> <CAC4RtVDPHDN6jfJ8xPPDQjfYuQHwuOvAoa4JiyfrKz5HwkURYg@mail.gmail.com> <4F2ACD02.40700@dcrocker.net> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C9A7DB8B@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C9A7DB8B@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:21:49 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Updated charter - final review
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:21:51 -0000

On 2/3/2012 10:15 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> Perhaps the charter should also contain a proscription against
>> meaningless charter content?
>
> We need a BCP for that.


Perhaps an analysis of the ecological impact of additions to charters and 
specification of material that is redundant, obvious or otherwise useless?

Extra words mean extra paper.  They also reduce the information salience of the 
document.  That is, it makes it harder to find the parts that /are/ imporant. 
No doubt there are other implications.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email