IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] WGLC: draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14

Scott Kitterman <spf2@kitterman.com> Fri, 17 May 2013 06:48 UTC

Return-Path: <spf2@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD2A21F930C for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 23:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HajdbhBLMnpt for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 23:48:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (mailout02.controlledmail.com [72.81.252.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423A921F92CB for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 23:48:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D2220E411A; Fri, 17 May 2013 02:48:05 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=2007-00; t=1368773285; bh=U3eJEob4YVJ9q5Ex+BqlXerw4f7l7znDeyKmmp/Aw00=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MO12YXUtswDfAg79ojaJppBmFj5StPtk1J6noNtpwC8cGoe6WKR8owhSyUffVQoSX 6r/5aQnEKyA80P5sgksKLQnTGLZ5z7DUqFGpbDK5/IgqxPcT16fgFW37UH6F2/0mv4 oiaUUyl7VxEModgLvpV7o08oJjBNEysn4faRH3x8=
Received: from scott-latitude-e6320.localnet (static-72-81-252-21.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2BDB20E40C6; Fri, 17 May 2013 02:48:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <spf2@kitterman.com>
To: spfbis@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 02:48:04 -0400
Message-ID: <342196331.8PjgpiStlt@scott-latitude-e6320>
User-Agent: KMail/4.10.2 (Linux/3.8.0-21-generic; KDE/4.10.2; i686; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20130424002629.13505.qmail@joyce.lan>
References: <20130424002629.13505.qmail@joyce.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Subject: Re: [spfbis] WGLC: draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 06:48:11 -0000

On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 12:26:29 AM John Levine wrote:
> >The "Some implementations ..." sentence seems to be malformed.  I can't
> >parse it.
> 
> That whole paragraph could be replaced by "the result of evaluating
> check_host() with a syntactically invalid domain is undefined."

Perfect.  Thanks and done locally.

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email