Re: [spfbis] WGLC: draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14

[Scott Kitterman <[e-mail]>]

On Tuesday, April 16, 2013 10:08:12 PM Dotzero wrote:
> I've reviewed the draft and have one "nit" and one question/comment:
> 
> In the Abstract the use of ADMD should be followed with
> (ADministrative Management Domains)
> 
>    Email on the Internet can be forged in a number of ways.  In
>    particular, existing protocols place no restriction on what a sending
>    host can use as the "MAIL FROM" of a message or the domain given on
>    the SMTP HELO/EHLO commands.  This document describes version 1 of
>    the Sender Policy Framework (SPF) protocol, whereby an ADMD can
>    explicitly authorize the hosts that are allowed to use its domain
>    names, and a receiving host can check such authorization.

Fixed locally.  I moved it up from the next paragraph to this one.

> 
> For section 2.6.7.  Permerror
> 
>    A "permerror" result means the domain's published records could not
>    be correctly interpreted.  This signals an error condition that
>    definitely requires manual intervention to be resolved.
> 
> Manual intervention by whom? Does this need to be clarified?

Since it's an error in the record, I think it's not something that needs to be 
changed.  Anyone else?

> Other than these two relatively minor details, nothing jumped out at me.
>
> Mike
>
Thanks for the review.

Scott K