Re: [spfbis] Review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-05

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Mon, 23 April 2012 04:08 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D6421E8018 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.638
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.638 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NqQ-Ve5quFNo for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cloudmark.com (cmgw1.cloudmark.com [208.83.136.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3880B21E8013 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com ([72.5.239.25]) by mail.cloudmark.com with bizsmtp id 1G8u1j0010ZaKgw01G8uqc; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:08:54 -0700
X-CMAE-Match: 0
X-CMAE-Score: 0.00
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=fNu7LOme c=1 sm=1 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:17 a=ldJM1g7oyCcA:10 a=w0_tcEhzsP4A:10 a=zutiEJmiVI4A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=MY9gt07EUMIXn2KaM3YA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:117
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::2524:76b6:a865:539c%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:08:33 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "spfbis@ietf.org" <spfbis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spfbis] Review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-05
Thread-Index: AQHNIMqwFmLLWp0VJEuOTXJcBTjdz5anzRGA//+OihCAAHiZAP//5QzwgAB83oD//46t8AAPXI6AAA6FPMA=
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 04:08:33 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280FED69@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <CAC4RtVAV5PH+VMzppVxAQgGq0f28ARN846e17G_8sbLCThm-KA@mail.gmail.com> <16903045.7Ta8mtnNKj@scott-latitude-e6320> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280FED45@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <2738361.74YB1Lktta@scott-latitude-e6320>
In-Reply-To: <2738361.74YB1Lktta@scott-latitude-e6320>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [67.160.203.60]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudmark.com; s=default; t=1335154134; bh=Keaspy+WSxVcJeD5Y3Fpj/Y8vIqJ4M8jpl6eptC0NLs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=p3AoQzw/YAgxpZsd9e9ZMNgayhT9JWPU/xDSTOwo+XUjOO74dOj6V95xX7piyoGCi 25hMtEmoDp3NIJXT/YJZFUDk59wZYuPGOmfP4QXsFZLnd4Hx2JnkUkam6EkRwk5Fsj q8LEBs1eD+FVDolfbruB0Ey3GGugUDbve4+YCATI=
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-05
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 04:08:45 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: spfbis-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:spfbis-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman
> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 9:03 PM
> To: spfbis@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [spfbis] Review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-05
> 
> Facts are not bias.  Wanting to sweep them under the rug is bias.  What
> I am asking for is the exact opposite of bias.

At this point I think I'll leave it to working group consensus.  I don't have any desire, nor I believe does Barry, to obscure facts that are relevant to the question.

-MSK