[spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4841)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 25 October 2016 10:14 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD501294A1 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 03:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.033
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.033 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UAp85V0i6Uuy for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 03:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C7D8129494 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 03:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 465D5B81107; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 03:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
To: scott@kitterman.com, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, sm+ietf@elandsys.com, ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20161025101445.465D5B81107@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 03:14:45 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/VPCu7oy6M14koZHr-nnXpuehyD4>
Cc: spfbis@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, vesely@tana.it
Subject: [spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4841)
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spfbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:14:46 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7208, "Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7208&eid=4841 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Section: 3.5. Original Text ------------- EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM *.EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM A.EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM *.A.EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM Corrected Text -------------- EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM. *.EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM. A.EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM. *.A.EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM. Notes ----- This is an editorial errata, since it is a punctuation error. It is not technical, because the example might have implied an $ORIGIN of "." or some other strange setting, while a normative reference --rfc 1035-- makes it very clear that "[d]omain names that end in a dot are called absolute, and are taken as complete." Hence no technical meaning is affected. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7208 (draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-21) -------------------------------------- Title : Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1 Publication Date : April 2014 Author(s) : S. Kitterman Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : SPF Update Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (484… RFC Errata System
- Re: [spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 … S Moonesamy