Re: [spfbis] SPF-checking tool

Stuart D Gathman <stuart@gathman.org> Thu, 27 February 2020 07:36 UTC

Return-Path: <SRS0=cpUQ2=4P==stuart@gathman.org>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83423A1411 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 23:36:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gathman.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iQbBgJTwJ-_0 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 23:36:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.gathman.org (wiki.gathman.org [IPv6:2001:470:8:809::1010]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 613B83A13F1 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 23:36:33 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: mail.gathman.org; iprev=pass policy.iprev="2001:470:8:809::1010" (wiki.gathman.org); auth=pass (CRAM-MD5 sslbits=256) smtp.auth=stuart
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gathman.org; i=@gathman.org; q=dns/txt; s=default; t=1582788991; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : date : from : subject; bh=IngGj7Q4X31kBf3uxVrujkyagiyvSjC4EgFN+7WTME8=; b=ZEzszwTL/ScWd1Ujz3xcIBpIE9PUFUnc7P0D+rSIZSEujZ+gY+ypMsmF D3T8pMYUWGZoC480DeAJLj2jL+TjFyVm3Pim5bFtdunfEi/5dPZLeOjGNp XqYRJB7jkfc8w59QbtfFluqWqRP10sRfWWuq5D2+MAP+TzNfh35fTCnc0=
Received: from wiki.gathman.org (wiki.gathman.org [IPv6:2001:470:8:809::1010]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.gathman.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 01R7aRD8002130 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:36:30 -0500
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:36:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Stuart D Gathman <stuart@gathman.org>
To: Frank Bulk <frnkblk@iname.com>
cc: spfbis@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <000001d5ecb6$106efd90$314cf8b0$@iname.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2002270235340.2087@mail.gathman.org>
References: <000001d5ecb6$106efd90$314cf8b0$@iname.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/WbehPXeqCeZkHhTR09tDW7hijNo>
Subject: Re: [spfbis] SPF-checking tool
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spfbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 07:38:22 -0000

On Wed, 26 Feb 2020, Frank Bulk wrote:

> I currently use kitterman's script, but it doesn't catch all the issues that
> Dmarcian does and so there's a number of domains that have issues but I'm
> not alerting on them. Dmarcian doesn't appear to have an API or downloadable
> version of their tool that I can run.

Are you checking DMARC, or SPF?

If SPF, can you give an example of an incorrect policy that is not
flagged?