IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-05

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Mon, 23 April 2012 22:04 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BC021F8593 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.57
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BIcJ288x9y1z for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACF921F8592 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.233.59]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3NM4AMY009475 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:04:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1335218663; i=@elandsys.com; bh=v8SfYwoggUua+YlZi1ehhG7VOwcNGKvbyxbmYcKy6rU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=Z3jWKLc6N2n0fvgqYrxkcX7TV2wIYnmfn2XN8Ft82MNyWYZ9sBFbHjqu76cN7Gqie 7j1TrWVZzelMFn7B4Wr7QJcB7mXDjzgDERC9ELqXqvAGCHbwqlVRyt5truwxfWmq/q 7l0Si8CQ2o38OJ9T56o68o+tMkbUahvLteCzkr+U=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1335218663; i=@elandsys.com; bh=v8SfYwoggUua+YlZi1ehhG7VOwcNGKvbyxbmYcKy6rU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=Xazkpp36RMWUsHyMWEXkD+8fRy6VcUkAYW7MixHztQ+8QPqvqrflv7tqwoAPindNG nR9rBDytvJKOW1Y0qUqcCLkJX/K/z8bkVTEjVTprdGYpNzjUU7f4ezEU1zL8ceVwTp V5y3QWPdCnQqyBY56tmIxLrJuV5glJ0AT0xA8jA4=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120423142839.0a727ce8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:50:10 -0700
To: spfbis@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F95C6F2.1030504@isdg.net>
References: <CAC4RtVAV5PH+VMzppVxAQgGq0f28ARN846e17G_8sbLCThm-KA@mail.gmail.com> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280FED0D@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <CAJ4XoYf2KNLsqzrrM39bWo1Z1Fun1qEiNMYstLf2ZCaaUDSzmA@mail.gmail.com> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280FF5C4@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <CAJ4XoYe1Vkge=2iWrFgzRyZL-XVt-7bhUCf=xJHhvZcR6mGFiA@mail.gmail.com> <4F95C30D.5070903@mail-abuse.org> <4F95C6F2.1030504@isdg.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-05
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:04:49 -0000

Hello,

Barry Leiba, as an individual, suggested text at 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis/current/msg01397.html 
There is also a discussion about normative references at 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis/current/msg01398.html

It's difficult for me to identify the other issues in 
draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-05 based on the messages posted to this 
thread.  I'll ask the document editor to post a new draft based on 
the latest round of discussions.  Although it might not reflect the 
outcome of the those discussions, it might provide some clarity.  The 
working group can then suggest text for proposed changes.

I'll remind the working group of the moderator note posted by Andrew 
Sullivan at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis/current/msg01388.html

Regards,
S. Moonesamy
SPFBIS WG co-chair

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email