IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] WGLC: draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 17 April 2013 04:56 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223CA21F97B3 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RqQKKZpOGgIi for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC3921F9636 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.133.137]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3H4tBA5010151 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1366174523; bh=dd3kGrkZ36uO/sUsKYj5U0ye3tUoLNE3b6LW/omynDU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=rX5LDU2fLs23j+inj484Y/ElOHFCp8YYkdNpXvr0xZMM1SPujSLrenck/kdHSz4ss 3uGHMwnADie7N+jbt7HiPP+nt4lNgoC3XsGpM306sKkP25e5VQO+CkxPatDVzrNL39 7taI3qV4vxOJFKDxengOeGpVDPRNwGJxJTRWdjB8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1366174523; i=@elandsys.com; bh=dd3kGrkZ36uO/sUsKYj5U0ye3tUoLNE3b6LW/omynDU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=EbizGLiOfkkVEymDn6WiOUgY+46xPaZbvIvLzgPZ7/pxjJpGcboOqKx4GIQEDonCB pFlSrTQbYmH7SZ7O6nI+4wc1ypsLAPKZx/jDXL7jyKgO7jSo/Mc8I+C2UNgE/Ch/pE OtXtFlBwoM2pWYJgAa9CrQ1tqLb/2i3W84pvXqxs=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130416214029.0c16f0b8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:50:35 -0700
To: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>, Tim Draegen <tim@eudaemon.net>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ4XoYegUT5WRmD_OuimM2Rzx9FBrbhMH2vqkAQx-7o3gnuVeA@mail.g mail.com>
References: <20130409062431.GK24624@mx1.yitter.info> <CAJ4XoYd2r7=Vd3Ge4JZie=Hz6+JupDR-OkuSRzRkyuk+5KHrKA@mail.gmail.com> <7FE87BAF-B202-4CD5-B7BA-EDABE151E142@eudaemon.net> <CAJ4XoYegUT5WRmD_OuimM2Rzx9FBrbhMH2vqkAQx-7o3gnuVeA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: spfbis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spfbis] WGLC: draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 04:56:26 -0000

Hi Mike, Tim,
At 19:42 16-04-2013, Dotzero wrote:
>At least what I found is relatively minor in the greater scheme of
>things. Reading the whole thing thoughtfully is so different from
>going back and forth on individual items.

As Scott mentioned, things have been very quiet for this WGLC.  It 
helps if there are people who read the draft as you did above as I 
can determine whether the working group reviewed the draft and is ok with it.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy (as document shepherd)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email