Re: [spfbis] SPF-checking tool

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Wed, 26 February 2020 22:20 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCA13A0913 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:20:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=zhObUf1x; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=hAIsQTTU
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ERPwYpgHUvkU for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:20:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A49913A0911 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:20:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 381EEF8028D; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 17:20:55 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1582755655; h=date : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : subject : to : from : message-id : from; bh=OeEwjddR8wPbQLJVuWOvgEO6bGwpt3onNfAQfGmjk5o=; b=zhObUf1xLGzpdEQj3MYBQY6ghLKf5z+saHn5e7eUPoxf2cb+uHTI8Mv51jXJbQSSYy6I8 E14RIb3JKuAH+v0DQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1582755655; h=date : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : subject : to : from : message-id : from; bh=OeEwjddR8wPbQLJVuWOvgEO6bGwpt3onNfAQfGmjk5o=; b=hAIsQTTUu19gZxeQKxAyKATYtS8/lEgdLzhVN+QTaEegeNwiqtfz8fBsCw54jO+zFPFyl WuQOa5dSzp1HSRdkwrtuQDXWnQul/4a+PvxIyeN/uTFo0L1Py0I17WpRwjFe+pocfLWeGXr d3ymOQ2+bVVu9bFKUNreFcUBdkGaaL4xjxLb6csVtn5PBopfDGHJQ+XTifMkTRsMYzyL0an Zp5qySVvb+qUkWztQvgs+iAnYAY/G6ofvjlySSduzMeLPrJ+iz4TJasL9rFxNllrbbxKiuY fu84blGyybQpaZ15X8Ds0b6Df2tqGRYCbaTJCg+Dbj70qworY0I4hrCxE9sg==
Received: from [10.98.203.233] (mobile-166-170-33-249.mycingular.net [166.170.33.249]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BECF8F801FB; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 17:20:54 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 22:20:52 +0000
In-Reply-To: <000001d5ecb6$106efd90$314cf8b0$@iname.com>
References: <000001d5ecb6$106efd90$314cf8b0$@iname.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: spfbis@ietf.org,Frank Bulk <frnkblk@iname.com>
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Message-ID: <77BD5EFF-1B66-4AD9-ADC0-4F0F94ED7BB8@kitterman.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/j994AbgOEdjEkf2nWWbhcdexvfc>
Subject: Re: [spfbis] SPF-checking tool
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spfbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 22:20:58 -0000

Can you give me an example or two?

Scott K

On February 26, 2020 3:04:37 PM UTC, Frank Bulk <frnkblk@iname.com> wrote:
>Can someone point me to a tool that would allow me to check a domain
>for its
>SPF correctness?  I'm currently performing an automated daily check of
>a few
>hundred domains (friendlies) and emailing the domain owners if there's
>an
>issue.  
>
>I currently use kitterman's script, but it doesn't catch all the issues
>that
>Dmarcian does and so there's a number of domains that have issues but
>I'm
>not alerting on them. Dmarcian doesn't appear to have an API or
>downloadable
>version of their tool that I can run.
>
>Frank 
>
>_______________________________________________
>spfbis mailing list
>spfbis@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis