IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Proof of non-deployment [root@primary.se: Cron <root@primary> /usr/local/libexec/spf-txt.sh]

Scott Rose <scottr.nist@gmail.com> Tue, 07 October 2014 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <scottr.nist@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFF21A8FD4 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 11:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SVm1OGUdXFCr for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 11:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wsget2.nist.gov (wsget2.nist.gov [129.6.13.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1C8C1ACEF5 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 11:03:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from WSXGHUB1.xchange.nist.gov (129.6.18.96) by wsget2.nist.gov (129.6.13.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 14:03:07 -0400
Received: from postmark.nist.gov (129.6.16.94) by WSXGHUB1.xchange.nist.gov (129.6.18.96) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.348.2; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 14:03:34 -0400
Received: from 6-140.antd.nist.gov (6-140.antd.nist.gov [129.6.140.6]) by postmark.nist.gov (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s97I3Nc8002721; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 14:03:23 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Scott Rose <scottr.nist@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYpA_snEkjnCeXFcxf6kzt-8rF1+Uovypn1yNe+5VVB+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 14:03:22 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <55ED1A31-355E-4281-8EBE-EBBB19FEAB96@gmail.com>
References: <20141007063737.GA28581@besserwisser.org> <D6213AB4-ABB2-45C5-AA52-59369B03B88F@anvilwalrusden.com> <CAL0qLwYpA_snEkjnCeXFcxf6kzt-8rF1+Uovypn1yNe+5VVB+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-NIST-MailScanner-Information:
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/qSlj1QVZt-ALoKl6bx_8rg5OnMs
Cc: "spfbis@ietf.org" <spfbis@ietf.org>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Proof of non-deployment [root@primary.se: Cron <root@primary> /usr/local/libexec/spf-txt.sh]
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:04:17 -0000

On Oct 7, 2014, at 12:15 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:

> Given the survey work recorded in RFC6686, I would be curious to hear people's theories explaining the substantial uptick of TYPE99 queries in the last two years while the industry has actually gone in the opposite direction.  Of course, that presumes there's ample breadth and no bias in the traffic seen by this one resolver.
> 

I know there has been a push to deploy SPF and DKIM in the .gov TLD, so that may be some of the uptick.  From past experience, I would wager most enterprises are using older, already deployed code that does queries for both TYPE99 and TXT RR's when looking for SPF polices.  For .gov agencies, if they have existing, known code that has the functionality, it's easier to turn it on then upgrade.  Wouldn't account for all of the increase though.

Scott

> -MSK
> _______________________________________________
> spfbis mailing list
> spfbis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis

===================================
Scott Rose
NIST
scott.rose@nist.gov
+1 301-975-8439
Google Voice: +1 571-249-3671
http://www.dnsops.gov/
===================================

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email