IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Updated charter - final review

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Fri, 03 February 2012 18:15 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF62C21F8597 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:15:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.588
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wPNoj9KP+ZCA for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:15:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B9F21F8595 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:15:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spite.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.72) by exch-htcas901.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:15:46 -0800
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by spite.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.72]) with mapi; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:15:45 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "spfbis@ietf.org" <spfbis@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:15:44 -0800
Thread-Topic: [spfbis] Updated charter - final review
Thread-Index: Aczimu1e4+21xnSoSS2QTfcd6SnfCQABN/+Q
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C9A7DB8B@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <4F28DBB7.5070101@qualcomm.com> <4F29E395.3020100@mail-abuse.org> <5905d04c-42eb-42f0-b580-1fb654cfe5af@email.android.com> <4F2A11E7.10409@mail-abuse.org> <CAC4RtVDPHDN6jfJ8xPPDQjfYuQHwuOvAoa4JiyfrKz5HwkURYg@mail.gmail.com> <4F2ACD02.40700@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F2ACD02.40700@dcrocker.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Updated charter - final review
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:15:47 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: spfbis-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:spfbis-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 9:51 AM
> To: Barry Leiba
> Cc: spfbis@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [spfbis] Updated charter - final review
> 
> Perhaps the charter should also contain a proscription against
> meaningless charter content?

We need a BCP for that.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email