Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method

gao.yang2@zte.com.cn Thu, 19 May 2011 02:03 UTC

Return-Path: <gao.yang2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: splices@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: splices@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37941E06BA for <splices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.838
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.838 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tQQF--rwYC-5 for <splices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [95.130.199.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E49E0684 for <splices@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.100] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 18341917726163; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:56:23 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.20] by [192.168.168.16] with StormMail ESMTP id 38461.2073369764; Thu, 19 May 2011 10:02:41 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id p4J22ldT047599; Thu, 19 May 2011 10:02:47 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from gao.yang2@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <4DD3F344.4050208@ericsson.com>
To: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: FFB8FF15:8AA3EF9D-48257895:000ADCB1; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <OFFFB8FF15.8AA3EF9D-ON48257895.000ADCB1-48257895.000B54D2@zte.com.cn>
From: gao.yang2@zte.com.cn
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:02:42 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-05-19 10:02:48, Serialize complete at 2011-05-19 10:02:48
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 000B54CF48257895_="
X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn p4J22ldT047599
Cc: splices@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method
X-BeenThere: splices@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Loosely-coupled SIP Devices \(splices\) working group discussion list" <splices.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/splices>
List-Post: <mailto:splices@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 02:03:08 -0000

> putting the action in the body seems to make more sense;

Agree with this. 
"Session" and "application based on session" should be treated as two 
level. Then, making application level indication as body could be more 
acceptable for me.

Thanks,

Gao


--------------------------------------------------------
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.
This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.