Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method

Peter Musgrave <musgravepj@gmail.com> Tue, 17 May 2011 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <musgravepj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: splices@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: splices@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FEA5E071C for <splices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 May 2011 10:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fZBRJ5c7lf+w for <splices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 May 2011 10:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0AECE0774 for <splices@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 May 2011 10:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so714821fxm.31 for <splices@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 May 2011 10:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=NS8fbdmnt4Dotgq/KArPU2kCXP0aoE9kG3AxHWJUAs0=; b=rXIFggHDrS61i2e20kS2LhPQXMf1qCAZkhTPmvJY04IKC6duH5Em30Yqqjaq96jnFU h2Xfc5H491n3cjS4N9fc46iB11plQt4F2nbnxXDfBn/iXQUmEzMDFQoN3qYKBU7wbFmb NE6bQeMUx7zwDqkfXVbg25h39zlnrXEghxv8g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=gHFLvUGhLnirD2ecooP6/lgNciH97VF61MwjxSqxJtcDYkeiiKjwWSOUgQuPRbuMMW Yu5AyygOGMF28CCwI4pr0wqzZgvf8aEC9c/+TIplA1NW4d9gFWd8GmZjR1caUAnjEBqS xZkmTJMSA5fysyFkXu5TvsSHxyDORWGrjBMcw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.62.194 with SMTP id y2mr1084197fah.123.1305652418833; Tue, 17 May 2011 10:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.103.67 with HTTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 10:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinLjrS3DocT=_MbnDrHdoTLs7RuhQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6369CB70BFD88942B9705AC1E639A33822CBDA8EBF@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <BANLkTinLjrS3DocT=_MbnDrHdoTLs7RuhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:13:38 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTik5+YTpuCvOZCwzMn_vqScna3A-eA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Musgrave <musgravepj@gmail.com>
To: "Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)" <rifatyu@avaya.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0015174769809ff16404a37be498"
Cc: "splices@ietf.org" <splices@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method
X-BeenThere: splices@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Loosely-coupled SIP Devices \(splices\) working group discussion list" <splices.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/splices>
List-Post: <mailto:splices@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 17:13:40 -0000

Doh! I meant implicit subscriptions.

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Peter Musgrave <musgravepj@gmail.com>wrote:

> I agree with other comments that explicit subscriptions are evil.
>
>