Re: [splices] Using Two Separate Devices to Start a Conversation proposal

"Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com> Fri, 01 July 2011 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <dworley@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: splices@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: splices@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4D49E800B for <splices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.37
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.37 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.229, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hv4rZ5Cy3cov for <splices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36859E8008 for <splices@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:26:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EALodDk7GmAcF/2dsb2JhbABSqAF3rnkCmw+GMgSXRYs6
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,460,1304308800"; d="scan'208";a="254485564"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 01 Jul 2011 15:26:48 -0400
Received: from dc-us1hcex1.us1.avaya.com (HELO DC-US1HCEX1.global.avaya.com) ([135.11.52.20]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 01 Jul 2011 15:25:51 -0400
Received: from DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com ([169.254.2.172]) by DC-US1HCEX1.global.avaya.com ([2002:870b:3414::870b:3414]) with mapi; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 15:26:47 -0400
From: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>, "splices@ietf.org" <splices@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 15:26:09 -0400
Thread-Topic: [splices] Using Two Separate Devices to Start a Conversation proposal
Thread-Index: Acw37nvelmMKoMQRT4Kjlrzzi4C+EwANj6/3
Message-ID: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B222B1F5722@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
References: <6369CB70BFD88942B9705AC1E639A33822CCE270F5@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <BANLkTin+7fnDjmsfZVWKsmt631B7toRYVw@mail.gmail.com> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B222907E9A1@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <1C6C5AB3-6085-4CCA-9F1D-8BA5D98ED651@gmail.com> <4DED2EFA.20004@cisco.com> <BANLkTimfP2EaJZtPcjOp6s4v+Gk87vetGw@mail.gmail.com>, <4E0051B1.1030007@ericsson.com> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B222B1F571D@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>, <4E0DBA02.4040309@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E0DBA02.4040309@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [splices] Using Two Separate Devices to Start a Conversation proposal
X-BeenThere: splices@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Loosely-coupled SIP Devices \(splices\) working group discussion list" <splices.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/splices>
List-Post: <mailto:splices@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 19:26:51 -0000

Which reminds me of a requirement that should be in the draft:  The mechanism should work even if both endpoints are using it at the same time.

Dale