Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method - implicit registrations
Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Tue, 17 May 2011 13:26 UTC
Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: splices@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: splices@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FB3E06D5 for <splices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 May 2011 06:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bmoydma3nk1J for <splices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 May 2011 06:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE39E06B8 for <splices@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 May 2011 06:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7ceaae0000076dc-ea-4dd27790d28e
Received: from esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 7B.A1.30428.09772DD4; Tue, 17 May 2011 15:26:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.136]) by esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.115.84]) with mapi; Tue, 17 May 2011 15:26:40 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)" <rifatyu@avaya.com>, "splices@ietf.org" <splices@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 15:26:38 +0200
Thread-Topic: SIP INVOKE method - implicit registrations
Thread-Index: AcwUlG21RcTDGyn+QBi7uyh9D1M1iwAAS2xw
Message-ID: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A0585194E1859C2@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <6369CB70BFD88942B9705AC1E639A33822CBDA8EBF@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <6369CB70BFD88942B9705AC1E639A33822CBDA8EBF@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method - implicit registrations
X-BeenThere: splices@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Loosely-coupled SIP Devices \(splices\) working group discussion list" <splices.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/splices>
List-Post: <mailto:splices@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:26:43 -0000
Hi, Section 3 says: "An INVOKE request implicitly establishes a subscription to the 'invoke' event." However, section 4.2.1 of the 3265bis draft (latest version has expired, but I assume it's still intended to be moved forward) has removed implicit registrations, saying that only SUBSCRIBE can be used to create subscriptions. Regards, Christer ________________________________ From: splices-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:splices-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat) Sent: 17. toukokuuta 2011 16:15 To: splices@ietf.org Subject: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Hi, As discussed in the last SPLICES WG meeting in Prague, the REFER method is overloaded and has limitations that prevents it from being the ideal method for action invocation. We have worked on the following new draft that defines a new SIP method to be used for invoking actions: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yusef-splices-invoke/ We would appreciate it if people review the document and provide us with their feedback. Regards, Rifaat
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method gao.yang2
- [splices] SIP INVOKE method Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method - implicit regist… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method - implicit regist… Adam Roach
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Peter Musgrave
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Peter Musgrave
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Parthasarathi R (partr)
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Parthasarathi R (partr)
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Parthasarathi R (partr)
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Peter Musgrave
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Peter Musgrave
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Peter Musgrave
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Christer Holmberg
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method R.Jesske
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)
- Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method Hutton, Andrew