IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [splices] Answering a Call Using Two Separate Devices proposal

Peter Musgrave <peter.musgrave@magorcorp.com> Fri, 22 April 2011 23:17 UTC

Return-Path: <peter.musgrave@magorcorp.com>
X-Original-To: splices@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: splices@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A50E079D for <splices@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id crqS0oHB9A-z for <splices@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A0CE06AD for <splices@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yxk30 with SMTP id 30so309094yxk.31 for <splices@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.90.23.19 with SMTP id 19mr1619181agw.108.1303514262743; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.106] ([204.237.32.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x34sm3200904ana.36.2011.04.22.16.17.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:17:41 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Peter Musgrave <peter.musgrave@magorcorp.com>
In-Reply-To: <6369CB70BFD88942B9705AC1E639A33822CAF44765@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 19:17:38 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <888156C5-4209-43A7-9ACE-A5A89287F066@magorcorp.com>
References: <6369CB70BFD88942B9705AC1E639A33822CAF444FA@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <4DB1BA51.4080307@cisco.com> <6369CB70BFD88942B9705AC1E639A33822CAF4465A@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <BF60C410-7062-4824-92F3-7F655986ECA3@magorcorp.com> <6369CB70BFD88942B9705AC1E639A33822CAF44765@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
To: "Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)" <rifatyu@avaya.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "splices@ietf.org" <splices@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [splices] Answering a Call Using Two Separate Devices proposal
X-BeenThere: splices@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Loosely-coupled SIP Devices \(splices\) working group discussion list" <splices.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/splices>
List-Post: <mailto:splices@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 23:17:44 -0000

Hi,

On 2011-04-22, at 6:42 PM, Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat) wrote:

>> Then when a reINVITE with video is offered the PC will receive a notification
>> and it can offer the user a choice to accept the call there - with some pop-up
>> and beep (or whatever). If the user accepts then it could send a REFER to the
>> phone to make it offer video to the PC. (I first thought of using an INVITE
>> with JOIN from PC to phone - but then the video offer comes from the PC and
>> forces the phone to build a video answer based on the PCs offer - which seems
>> a bad idea).
>> 
> It complicates matters a little bit, but it would work.

I agree it's inelegant. 

How about an INVITE from the PC to the phone with delayed offer (i.e. no SDP in INVITE) and a JOIN?

Peter Musgrave

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email