Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method

"Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)" <> Tue, 17 May 2011 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30974E06C8 for <>; Tue, 17 May 2011 10:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.098
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id glgHJy8Xj33F for <>; Tue, 17 May 2011 10:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE2FE06B0 for <>; Tue, 17 May 2011 10:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuQAAD6v0k2HCzI1/2dsb2JhbACCZZRpjWNrd6wIAptqhhkElF2KRQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.65,226,1304308800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="246898008"
Received: from unknown (HELO ([]) by with ESMTP; 17 May 2011 13:27:18 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.65,226,1304308800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="652979498"
Received: from (HELO ([]) by with ESMTP; 17 May 2011 13:27:17 -0400
Received: from ([]) by ([2002:870b:3414::870b:3414]) with mapi; Tue, 17 May 2011 13:27:17 -0400
From: "Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)" <>
To: "Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)" <>, "" <>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:27:15 -0400
Thread-Topic: SIP INVOKE method
Thread-Index: AcwUlG21RcTDGyn+QBi7uyh9D1M1iwAIncUg
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6369CB70BFD88942B9705AC1E639A33822CBDA9433DCUS1MBEX4glo_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [splices] SIP INVOKE method
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Loosely-coupled SIP Devices \(splices\) working group discussion list" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 17:27:23 -0000

Thank you all for your quick review and feedback so far.
I will work on a new version of the draft that removes the implicit subscription.

Please, let me know if you have any other comments beside the implicit subscription issue.


From: [] On Behalf Of Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 9:15 AM
Subject: [splices] SIP INVOKE method


As discussed in the last SPLICES WG meeting in Prague, the REFER method is overloaded and has limitations that prevents it from being the ideal method for action invocation.
We have worked on the following new draft that defines a new SIP method to be used for invoking actions:

We would appreciate it if people review the document and provide us with their feedback.