IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-10.txt

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Sun, 23 February 2020 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769E73A0ED7 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 12:47:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DsnTjWq36NQx for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 12:46:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [83.247.10.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 798613A0ED6 for <spring@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 12:46:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135114B; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 21:46:55 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:date:date:subject:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-type:message-id:from:from :received:received; s=mail; t=1582490813; bh=I6gOYIgEsm0DH5H5RBN JVYfZS2+rhQAtuD2/w1gK5FM=; b=a5nSuAMm5iSBT9y5AKaS4ro4qgrQ0cywrY+ 1++I+6xUIC0EzUo/dqGHhRT1YL0Udv27UOfH1+5m981jK7GC55JWA4YZpwBvA82D PKEr0k+/RGIajl8RczpGMaSzjcj00EM4koPdVxSQi3835fWs1tKcWf6XQIkMaFo8 va6PZUps=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id FhSydft0OcUd; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 21:46:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:8921:c1ed:e98b:133d] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:8921:c1ed:e98b:133d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 268403C; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 21:46:53 +0100 (CET)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Message-Id: <1BB7ED35-98EC-4A73-92A3-AD043D462CF7@steffann.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4C99E784-2AE6-43CC-AC40-283F8E7937A4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3594.4.19\))
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 21:46:51 +0100
In-Reply-To: <7481061F-75A5-4E4D-80AE-40E1F933E94A@cisco.com>
Cc: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <158248836511.1031.1350509839394231473@ietfa.amsl.com> <7481061F-75A5-4E4D-80AE-40E1F933E94A@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3594.4.19)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/-AV4z3VCtE6S1q13qBXfxumtZRA>
Subject: Re: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-10.txt
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 20:47:00 -0000

Hi,

> We have published a new update to draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming. This revision simplifies the counters as per [1], clarifies the upper layer header processing as per [2] and removes the reference to the OAM draft [3].

I still oppose the segment popping flavours in section 4.16 without updating RFC8200.

Cheers,
Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email