IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Relative advantages of SRv6

Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Fri, 10 January 2020 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235BF1200DB for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:14:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=omrP2TFh; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=bNOIPOi6
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BaAbSt0pO7Ke for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:14:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FA7A120019 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:14:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108162.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 00AJBjgJ019182; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:14:17 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=kWogekuy6s7XSRarYf5m+3FzZEhR0H+x6yhTjFE8hLs=; b=omrP2TFhRky8+ucCnat3igL86QkwfwTqdsersvLr1SqZ4rI+W0PEnntMg7+wmwF5jC/0 H8mrs0X4/0Ni6PLh6bZIyG+wz/qLvsir2tSMK8P6K3wsBIyt0x8eHSIMVejV6Vtv3Iep HZbTqSlU3b5ObGU66oaoKQj4P8D0HOIhPkanFySasuIDGL95U1U8OB2PgxOKkSNkZIw6 Re8hw5spRsFsvZvv+uj4xkd/4BNcNiQfl7blqL2s4t7dHAdo6W0QY4YcaoIBdv74qTnY b+HDXRgZ3Rw+C+aB0RR/vIf0AKkXHv/ORTQ/fJ7usf8IwBYFA1DzZsqDuolAk3iQbyoJ vQ==
Received: from nam12-mw2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-mw2nam12lp2044.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.66.44]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xegab1by5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:14:17 -0800
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=NgHy4dU3NkoegGaU6x/bCYH0eN9k9Gd/p1g1IvXR6TZzXEuOlCM/2jMtjfwikJ6knjEcKwkX2HMTK4jlV7gbhTAfrttZZBdfjwvR77ya0WZuqJvkTbgJuDVw/McZwM3UZKrycd5FoEnVfP0bI7JCGWOgFI8N/e9jcIQcq4sfL9CpPOCFxaGZAB/7xMjCvVrT6SxCW7yChNoZWF3meqFSrWvmBxppsN0cGVadXlM+l/mcfy9IAp1oe+c21Q74WdJREw76bMqmJZHSMg968wzjfYlY8G9avhUVm8mxxLohP0SO0ylBczZo0hgpTF1OLAiUyC690WKyYhH9a3TNMiLKBg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=kWogekuy6s7XSRarYf5m+3FzZEhR0H+x6yhTjFE8hLs=; b=S0wOx/+heY2vruZHYiO4+eoC1CeSoeA88LXBk2isT6ZI2Zj09q7i88FhZhxpBlmvc2y43cBrWpD9dCbthOhdJtAm8m4TcWN/PVRf/KEXoUGOclJQf6bdtawwunYVnyL0C2Qbv7k3NgNRon+uRf5ldSnTJZx34OS3tFrXXLJROXEqjnk3wKN0MZvw6MMFrGlkyai9E7JY6CNEHq4Sg/re1Mak/SywwpoO77OOtpWm71FO6lwbRDI4wxU9o2wyByBFcYtsbKbYPekkhVknBqgUf+SNYgsIZXOLn78MdVaemGWdvWNAPmfMPP4gWNWFQV6BpJiL1CKOX4+k2H8rrV5sOw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=kWogekuy6s7XSRarYf5m+3FzZEhR0H+x6yhTjFE8hLs=; b=bNOIPOi6ecigZGWAZh+wpK+qdsmArl4uuEzvSlR1DIfCNlOdNwZoHmhS6hjJ7TWLg4uJsusa4FHA8LIVWFqU3S2b8N701Z5UuCLdJiSw3i7X0M0UW1pAPb3kO6koqY/DKx2s/BLZVEbMiU748fAMZ5Jgjjr/2j7W+P/Fes+tfPI=
Received: from BN7PR05MB3938.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.132.216.30) by BN7PR05MB4066.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.132.221.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.6; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:14:15 +0000
Received: from BN7PR05MB3938.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f826:68df:3aa7:4864]) by BN7PR05MB3938.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f826:68df:3aa7:4864%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2623.010; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:14:15 +0000
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>
CC: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Relative advantages of SRv6
Thread-Index: AQHVxTtBCnUJ5T9wFUOlTR4tmYQzLKffgKoggASzHYCAABXGoA==
Content-Class:
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:14:15 +0000
Message-ID: <BN7PR05MB39388473DA8171C001866411AE380@BN7PR05MB3938.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <048C0650-83A6-4584-90B3-46DCC37B4E57@cisco.com> <BN7PR05MB393848102282E3746D705407AE3F0@BN7PR05MB3938.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <C5679D89-B4BC-4C97-B733-52BE87B8AC27@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C5679D89-B4BC-4C97-B733-52BE87B8AC27@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=True; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Owner=rbonica@juniper.net; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2020-01-10T19:14:11.7564050Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=Juniper Business Use Only; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Application=Microsoft Azure Information Protection; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=dd93e2a5-6764-47c3-966b-10b8241fcd18; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Extended_MSFT_Method=Automatic
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.3.2.8
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [108.28.233.91]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ba78b13c-5a53-48c7-f889-08d7960148b2
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN7PR05MB4066:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN7PR05MB40668013C3B69BB46F673824AE380@BN7PR05MB4066.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 02788FF38E
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(366004)(39860400002)(396003)(346002)(376002)(136003)(199004)(189003)(478600001)(6916009)(9686003)(66476007)(8936002)(55016002)(4326008)(7696005)(86362001)(5660300002)(81156014)(8676002)(81166006)(33656002)(66446008)(66946007)(66556008)(64756008)(71200400001)(52536014)(2906002)(76116006)(6506007)(966005)(26005)(53546011)(316002)(186003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN7PR05MB4066; H:BN7PR05MB3938.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: x0S1pT/zfzYClazD+IhtgbuNGQcESpsZ+n5+6oEDvrkGsDLU8JPr9i1+pvlgauFXV7jvLVql7d8+11arqWP3A3KOe6eC8MMJggPxuJFgCOYLmgkC7a6x/wcJT1pBRoHFZs+nF0zSkFJgRWjWr0uBDIiKjWtJaXc1eZ/GpNs+o23Y4UmvgMFUz7imNIBkRn+Jtf4xy16H+/5SAmznczOsuQZxakAYpzmcud2QyvndZGhFGdH1DwpqKaVgVNLFKKmEYce2oboKEezb5FqRb7gtfeEJbmhP2G8eG7pkUNQb9Bj63aZuW8zq5OiCiD6D+MvJQGhiXBM3D5I3f1JjguuVskMo7+Ki2bM9WSTzIS+61BckwUaxGIpyfvsxkOzjGZ79UW7J4Ta+EBleyq8I20MUnOd7prwlcHEnH6SRdX33xvsXB9C5sT2lz0205Oq58uC2Ia4UgyiVBdoSpWnkDhkLC2lih+aBUMP+ctMC2zvnzEg=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN7PR05MB39388473DA8171C001866411AE380BN7PR05MB3938namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: ba78b13c-5a53-48c7-f889-08d7960148b2
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Jan 2020 19:14:15.3577 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: D7BxeVFIHjUbe6JZHFRVvHm2S2KDXWNOsuTq6+5cdL7Ip+P5mLwO5nmLa+GE3HJKOsaOGdIaPhkZsW8PG9VK6g==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN7PR05MB4066
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-01-10_01:2020-01-10, 2020-01-09 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-2001100155
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/-ApVooZjYudE6WaMlJ74oWdTnQg>
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Relative advantages of SRv6
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:14:27 -0000

Chairs,

I believe that we have two independent requests for a comparison of the benefits of SRv6 over SR-MPLS in the network programming draft.

                                                            Ron




Juniper Business Use Only
From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 11:55 AM
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Relative advantages of SRv6

Ron,

If you want to discuss your analysis please let's do so in a separate email thread out of the context of the Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming.

As I said before: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming is a Standards Track document and this topic is not about any standardization, hence out of scope of this document.

Same applies to other content (e.g. illustrations) that was formerly in network programming and we moved to a separate draft since it was not standardizing anything at all and was merely informative.

Thanks,
Pablo.

From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net<mailto:rbonica@juniper.net>>
Date: Tuesday, 7 January 2020 at 19:17
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com<mailto:pcamaril@cisco.com>>
Cc: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Relative advantages of SRv6

Pablo,

RFC 8354 reinforces my analysis in https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/3WGuQumIfcmH281nwq3s9Un6raI<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/3WGuQumIfcmH281nwq3s9Un6raI__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SolNvh35q4NS-PTVWOxXAzbTnMHltfvPWi_OSjhMYkmm_NucR6imYrrLvc35Kat6$>. Are you saying that you agree with this analysis?

                                             Ron






Juniper Business Use Only
From: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) <pcamaril@cisco.com<mailto:pcamaril@cisco.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2020 4:17 AM
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net<mailto:rbonica@juniper.net>>
Cc: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Relative advantages of SRv6

Ron,

SPRING has already done this work and documented the SRv6 use-cases in RFC8354 before progressing with the SRv6 standardization.

Further on, draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming is a Standards Track document.
I fail to see how a cite from RFC8354 or any other text on "SRv6 vs SR-MPLS" standardises anything at all.
Note that we have already removed text from draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming (e.g. illustrations) because it was not standardising anything.

Thank you for the suggestion,
Pablo.

From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Date: Monday, 30 December 2019 at 11:08
To: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Subject: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Relative advantages of SRv6

Pablo,

Would you consider adding a short section to the draft explaining the relative advantages of SRv6 over SR-MPLS? This section would explain why an network operator would deploy SRv6 instead of SR-MPLS.

                                                                                         Ron



Juniper Business Use Only

Please excuse any typos, sent from my 'smart'phone.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email