IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 24 September 2020 00:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68E23A15E6; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.854
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.854 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001, NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR=1.242, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9gQ_TIx321v5; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x233.google.com (mail-oi1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F2B53A15E5; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x233.google.com with SMTP id i17so1774838oig.10; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Uv3brUnlsCGP9raC4ANjJBIRfLLAF+0Y71Bc97yMZMw=; b=QwCpIc5kZeiHvx/TmBbmhUpoS68q+bc3e6GT+yHTiiKqHyqWndQtnQxAykcgjrYKSV +Cb7jXepiWveweIuozDslgVTq1eHoN9r97f8/qQX4qS0Ws022700LjXASxlzm39tHI32 y9xOXWLe9MGx3ulIbk3jLXKvhd/9WAhzH3TI3hwWYLPqgE3BvhFO9ePadsZQzejBmIJq UwrX81o1NNGGkZblPwoA8oIVSJiqT57W8B3aMQcNxhiCoFUR1J1h3RhJlbxulw9h4cvB hXCiR33/0/eOwPGbG2cwQzSnAkGpiaFIOHZa4AMF7YSxttUdHsxVGcP6sl75V4gACVbw 2HHA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Uv3brUnlsCGP9raC4ANjJBIRfLLAF+0Y71Bc97yMZMw=; b=A2q0XA5W17MYg9BnncO//kvu8Z/+HYLO+tkfSVu5hR3rKe9j54B1OaRt9znLhSp8pu HZU7SF+AvqMtJGKvNdrTQgAnlmKT2UnLQq48NXDQ5zdRPlu8RKLHtyLIMSCrk3e0dgSR jNANOZwMo85hoOyIbOJM2NzntvYdGLXIb30wwWpcqxcd9sxbV+sHBY6VsVQWmRLlncXm O8sKQVMl/ubOCP26VzoVVFEOtkxqqe28OQtjJUZzDTeoJG3f/jZY/qfcUwULlbhI+aP8 agBMRVLtY2p0NfVecz2ATuY5ol3Fvdh4/qNBupz8vzwYUWgYcGcfGtl8jm4ZbeL8qnsZ pPXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530zlpYOjE2utnnXkzTRrWgvpD5XiaGPuL8eT0cn9Bl7sVjfIAeM C1lb4e3EW8TID9ARxDKqiJEc5e3DA17eBn0qaOI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyZa4Mk/kNBfqlnGsKtkYIClBfmowhml/Tfj6qV9Vgduudn9Wryiszz6g6C143lCf5EJ9bgqJ4uPumuURkcyTg=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:654b:: with SMTP id j11mr1114633oiw.77.1600906963547; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160089467694.11025.16329903730475278493@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160089467694.11025.16329903730475278493@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:22:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMGpriXLVKj2ow+K0pYdtRgaVvCX_-XKaqhksZt-ZHVtd9kvdQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Bruno Decraene <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>, Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, spring-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e179a205b004324d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/-EuntPP8gP_qQDMUbyC7ds6U88w>
Subject: Re: [spring] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:22:46 -0000

>
> (5) This point is for the IESG to discuss.
>
> §4.16.1.2:
>
>       The End, End.X and End.T behaviors with PSP do not contravene
>       Section 4 of [RFC8200] because the destination address of the
>       incoming packet is the address of the node executing the behavior.
>
> The spring WG's interpretation of rfc8200 was a central point in the appeal
> presented against the WG consensus on this document.  The text above, I
> believe, reflects that consensus.
>
> However, given that the document relies on the spring WG's interpretation
> of
> rfc8200, I think it would be better if the text is explicit.
>
> Suggestion: to add at the end of the paragraph>
>
>    This conclusion represents the consensus interpretation of the spring
> WG.
>

This seems like an important -- and entirely reasonable -- thing to note.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email