Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-spring-srv6-path-segment

"chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn" <chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn> Fri, 06 November 2020 03:56 UTC

Return-Path: <chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECB13A09A5; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 19:56:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.887
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.887 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EdCr-WrncaPT; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 19:56:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.227]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C883A0995; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 19:56:07 -0800 (PST)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.48:18864.601844277
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-14.25.171.161?logid-8202811683034e678f854cd4d8fee2af (unknown [172.18.0.48]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 1013F28008B; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 11:55:57 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 44093218@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.48]) by App0024 with ESMTP id 8202811683034e678f854cd4d8fee2af for james.n.guichard@futurewei.com; Fri Nov 6 11:56:01 2020
X-Transaction-ID: 8202811683034e678f854cd4d8fee2af
X-filter-score: filter<0>
X-Real-From: chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.48
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Sender: chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 11:55:59 +0800
From: "chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn" <chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn>
To: "James Guichard" <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>, "SPRING WG" <spring@ietf.org>
Cc: "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <DM6PR13MB3066A62CF601F8B88B6B5DD9D2110@DM6PR13MB3066.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.18.95[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2020110611545826672927@chinatelecom.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart372346422127_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/-fkB6CUUmxL_BF_sfXZi2l4KBIc>
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-spring-srv6-path-segment
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 03:56:11 -0000

hi,WG,
    I support the adoption.
    I have interesting in deploying the path segment to get end-to-end path protection.
   BR.
   HUANAN CHEN(陈华南)
Data Communication Research Department
Research Institute of China Telecom Co.,Ltd.
From: James Guichard
Date: 2020-11-04 01:39
To: spring@ietf.org
CC: spring-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-spring-srv6-path-segment
Dear WG:
 
This message starts a 3 week WG adoption call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-spring-srv6-path-segment-07, ending November 24th 2020. Please note that this document has several changes from v-06 that were requested by the SPRING chairs. For this reason, the chairs have extended the adoption call for an additional week to allow the WG enough time to review these changes before deciding on WG adoption. 
 
After review of the document please indicate support (or not) for WG adoption to the mailing list. Please also provide comments/reasons for that support (or lack thereof) as silence will not be considered as consent.
 
Thanks!
 
Jim, Bruno & Joel