IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-06

"Gaurav Dawra (gdawra)" <gdawra@cisco.com> Thu, 21 December 2017 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <gdawra@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42ADE12D890; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 07:27:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.529
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.529 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ACJIGrvUlRxv; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 07:27:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EB2012D948; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 07:26:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10938; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1513870019; x=1515079619; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=exolhKywA5TvNR3WOXsg7PXrrCMXW1ZAM1yNbYw++5g=; b=LqqC10/JxkFRj0bM4I2P1JUGsomhN13+WY3Af45zgwAJ9na3cm6z52Ck 8nTIituhQFNJo+k2670i7UA49V/E4gD4ruZXHozvYgkmyMNuS+9Gq82Vq 2SxdClAcM0fzjieVbeoSSomUrO44A2aXhi7hjTrTAkv6CY0Yg5mCV/uHG Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DEAQD90Tta/5hdJa1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJKdGZ0JweDf4okjxCBWieJBohRhVIUggEKhTsCGoQwPxgBAQEBAQEBAQFrKIUjAQEBBCNWEAIBCA4DAwECKAMCAgIfERQJCAIEAQ0FiUdMAxWkboInJocUDYMnAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYN/ghKBVoISDIJ5gmtFgVY4FoJhMYI0BZlgiSs9ApAvhH6CF5FjilKDDYhzAhEZAYE6AR85gU9vFWYBgX6CWReBZ3iJAYEWAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.45,436,1508803200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="47742799"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Dec 2017 15:26:56 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vBLFQuMv016398 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:26:56 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:26:55 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-012.cisco.com ([64.101.220.152]) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com ([64.101.220.152]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:26:55 -0500
From: "Gaurav Dawra (gdawra)" <gdawra@cisco.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "bruno.decraene@orange.com" <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
CC: "draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe@Ietf.org" <draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe@ietf.org>, "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-06
Thread-Index: AQHTQ4FPG6nbfTr8mEmw4rwyUO5SEg==
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:26:55 +0000
Message-ID: <F36473FB-920D-4851-9E3A-2CFB873A54AB@cisco.com>
References: <998FE834-F9C6-43F2-8D10-30EE14CCECB6@cisco.com> <114895D1-093E-4D91-873B-0F64E9EE9EA0@cisco.com> <A5D28916-75B0-4A6F-87D5-370E1C53D6A7@cisco.com> <CAMMESswbBtH8Pd3mEz7pW2GWGS0CW=ZB3FgZAc3Y_TsPsFhAXw@mail.gmail.com> <AC082436-EA2E-4C1C-9826-2E3EA89CFB2D@cisco.com> <19921_1513854380_5A3B95AC_19921_269_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A47929463@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <73AE44FA-B557-4F1B-9FAD-59AB8946C13F@cisco.com> <16374_1513866122_5A3BC38A_16374_164_5_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A47929A34@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <27769_1513867189_5A3BC7B5_27769_440_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A47929B47@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAMMESsxFBfDH1p0Tgh4_pA0Z4r2gimycxeBm3V8ueB3Xvar3gg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsxFBfDH1p0Tgh4_pA0Z4r2gimycxeBm3V8ueB3Xvar3gg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.28.0.171108
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.8.122]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F36473FB920D48519E3A2CFB873A54ABciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/0UEg2xvosPcuIATdIOic3BVIs08>
Subject: Re: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-06
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:27:10 -0000

Alvaro,

Done! Thanks.

Cheers,

Gaurav

From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, December 21, 2017 at 7:19 AM
To: Gaurav Dawra <gdawra@cisco.com>, Bruno Decraene <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe@Ietf.org" <draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe@ietf.org>, "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-06

On December 21, 2017 at 9:39:49 AM, bruno.decraene@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decraene@orange.com> (bruno.decraene@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decraene@orange.com>) wrote:

I see that you have also added the “note” on for the VPN routes. I don’t think it’s necessary here as:
- if both routes are VPN ones, they are both labelled and are comparable as per regular BGP/MPLS IP VPN routes
- if only the “policy” route is installed in the VRF (VRF fallback to the main FIB), only the labeled VPN routes is considered, hence preferred.

Bottom line, I think that the note can be removed in the VPN section (5.4). But nothing urgent, this can wait for a next update.

Hi!

I’m waiting for that next update to approve publication…

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email