[spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> Tue, 16 May 2023 14:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: spring@ietf.org
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF44CC05DDE0; Tue, 16 May 2023 07:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
To: draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy@ietf.org, spring-chairs@ietf.org, spring@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 10.3.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <168424587271.45431.10014516596562429177@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 07:04:32 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/0ggQlHR-4qLEGG_eFj8caok1Prw>
Subject: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 14:04:32 -0000

The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state
Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Joel Halpern)

The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy/

Comment:
This starts a two week adoption call for the subject draft.  Please speak up
if you support or object to WG adoption.  Two notes: 1) WG adoption is the
start of the process.  The basic question is whether you agree that the
subject is worth the working group time to work on, and whether this
represents a good starting point for the work. 2) Please include explanation
for your view.  Yes or no are not very helpful answers, as this is not a vote
but an evaluation of support and concerns. Thank you, Joel (for the WG Chairs)

We expect to close this call at the end of May, 2023.