IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Introduction of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming (was Re: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Relative advantages of SRv6)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 23 January 2020 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F97E120025 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 05:53:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aw2REc48vo2u for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 05:53:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x334.google.com (mail-ot1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::334]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68B4F12081F for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 05:53:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x334.google.com with SMTP id m2so2799709otq.3 for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 05:53:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hkGYt/KmT/cXZRSXTnmUDR+nJ7UjqkrhzbU0QG8uPMs=; b=KjbElaIKEHpLQ0zezaZGm7eTOi1djL03W5VZuqHCajKiumA1Mc/nsO91vTUa2nPY0Y dKQw/EGIzFp4d24qO9XyalthZkisI+hnBPkqx2na0AyJuOHByWmhvGI96hrnS/ZkPofF 3+Pp57mS2XF74S7c37l8eyqjwWdqNqaXlXFQ1onKj/F+/DmuFl8JAD9jxX+dHlVp+ywZ RL33mJ3hovzdvRt3MGMnauUZ7Vn327KrvoWQdT0L9qWEKuAlGMN8YF3sThC+4nGHmFH+ QxPtDv5rbke/w/YFUuTnbXNpvdZwJ9eHWon4XWtbPzvPtkrhbeYuJoBhKtxL9S2NNPQX Y3/A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hkGYt/KmT/cXZRSXTnmUDR+nJ7UjqkrhzbU0QG8uPMs=; b=FGJ5N2mMQSijABuw3UVKpOQZWeqxeYYNuOu1M6xTuTcMYuDBQOyApmu9P12aBiJeK9 86P8MltY9w8qRpVUroL9T7zZ/V5vWzKvOKGsX66vI0otswtQna7B5dIAoIo9F09Hp/5g 3TmaXtyFb/F+Pkxpg0TLL8wMCuKZvd4rzzJBcYjDZm+Nf8RHSa6jeLxWs9NU1UgtoR0l 0i2CRCIqr2fAK5htmsQ/w+9x/0fqvu+vm4/aUdDvJlePl7jEN8sGmtnqD78Gez7406Nz kOFYEtYd8/nyoktwN+O+gFslr8DNZb8CVHt2EX9m7lP3oRqeiVu1Ya+Crd97YHUpD8Jp nwEQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUnGQ7VHPrdGtMh6FMXli44F8xF9eJOdhIbOTxPFKaSBM+0eIkG irlr70NzkhiILbDkPkpq/sEzhRPZ88D50jF0KcTth8DJ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwJPmvdVi6fYSiVpb1vNv5H2370xbSxddLKlBJ85vN9v440aYhU9bz1wj5e/TP4rvQYScUSMXn+gutEUrNILv8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:18fa:: with SMTP id d26mr10574500otf.305.1579787601527; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 05:53:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <53C3A95E-DDE4-45BA-B9C7-5BAE2A0B00CD@cisco.com> <18023_1579183197_5E206C5D_18023_299_8_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48D5BC12@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <BN7PR05MB39389653758516C38E15451FAE360@BN7PR05MB3938.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <210E1F96-0BE0-4A19-95AB-97E0F6BE7098@cisco.com> <BN7PR05MB3938570E66E468E8528DD885AE0D0@BN7PR05MB3938.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <A5D721E5-3FB7-44A0-9ECB-882CD5874520@cisco.com> <BN7PR05MB393816AD3D6BFDE53B550FE3AE0C0@BN7PR05MB3938.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <D9E3044D-61A3-456E-8C00-2A71E3E6F9B1@cisco.com> <BN7PR05MB39385AA6EB3B57D01209E73CAE0F0@BN7PR05MB3938.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR05MB39385AA6EB3B57D01209E73CAE0F0@BN7PR05MB3938.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 14:53:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMG=RGmbeMK_GybzcZbhMyVYFHo3NGDpm6hqsQBqWB_F2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>, "bruno.decraene@orange.com" <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, "EXT - Byron.Hoskins@sprint.com" <Byron.Hoskins@sprint.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cfa558059ccef68f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/0nIOVb1gwHcMFtgJY5YmCMUNZis>
Subject: Re: [spring] Introduction of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming (was Re: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Relative advantages of SRv6)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:53:24 -0000

Hi Ron,

I am really not sure where are you going with this bumerang request.

Do you think that customers or users of the technology are so incapable
that IETF must provide them list of advantages of one protocol choice vs
alternatives ?

Is this really an IETF job to provide advantages of say ISIS over OSPF ?
IPSec/DTLS VPNs over MPLS-VPNs ? SRv6 over SR-MPLS ?

IETF works on standards defining interoperable protocol extensions if there
is support and interest from the industry. Apparently both SRv6 and SR-MPLS
demonstrated such support and interest.

It would be pretty bad and quite unhealthy now to take IETF to become a
technology judge. Especially in the subject of your request where choice of
SR transport goes fundamentally way outside of this WG.

Kind regards,
R.


On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 2:23 PM Ron Bonica <rbonica=
40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Pablo,
>
>
>
> So where should the advantages of SRv6 over SR-MPLS be documented?
>
>
>
> Maybe someone in the WG will offer to start a new document?
>
>
>
>                                   Ron
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email