Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression

Eduard Metz <> Thu, 05 August 2021 08:22 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B71E3A00B2 for <>; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 01:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vQjfvY7h1ZXM for <>; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 01:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B8BE3A00AD for <>; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 01:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id y34so9466492lfa.8 for <>; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 01:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1QVFOVmZZit51jBc4w7fXiiB+mR9E2Pv3zJae/Fl7Q0=; b=HSX6wqsEk60kGWhUO7rDsegvblto5C54wjBBh03xRkd8s2iSks4oqZeMWzMFLriklJ E55iIpWCxycIZ2ieqO8VsuuMQiytKxPJawbWpfwaq3ZaqYtG1d68GXrDxgmIBzXVW3O5 wAxojgNFuIIy0A94T0K7CkPCWlrRJUwlKPGwEVClYxmAFf640lEUbdebgiAIKgEsWpOW 56b+4pTNhABMCzVXiTXCZIkd702ZJ0ivWvijA7jELYcdHmb+RlNK3JD3BTIRcR6V34QO cm+oPp1gE3tgT0QqUwKJSFib1Fb2AmozRYSqehZQEUN0nT6jKTiW1VAJhnFq4K/yJvyi bbFg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1QVFOVmZZit51jBc4w7fXiiB+mR9E2Pv3zJae/Fl7Q0=; b=JphWJQn9pYLMjpd3WkycQP+O29DqglYWfbxkxIuJaAxLDHh6VTNgiqGUBkUVVzlman Vw1jC1QxAkZu4lCTrWnbnPrc9csryLseTbU3NtpEZwv90FOd1riWbVrAvCKr93vFiJ6X R29u8xtJgJuFK3ic9r+xpcgilDgauBc5xGgxQ+gZ/t7yaAIUIQvabdp+WrMWAPMx+Vyd LXLqCJua3/kqsq4SHSfb2PL8xCpuQFTo5GO8LJiuIDUDfDRzYu4FPtMMpCClolMng3qK LgGUK5SaZ4lAhRSi0ugbp6syZUyXURLHfwLPRCqxNr72t2TWtwExR3gDHbPihtZFFDoO 0NRw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ABMmyLGBeArXIyCYdW7adrMBzvL1pXYV3KOCDnlVhnC1E6vNg pKU2rjLoith+7M6NrhQji42HOmo03OHf/WE0XDtghza7tPQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyZQ6fdPg2ymdODUN8gyKK4xgiU1wDoFGEgVTVAUNI/Pj04rW36ZS6F/n0OQ+FVnzDVF1yq94G4iVQ3RTaehTk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:208a:: with SMTP id t10mr2955619lfr.503.1628151757007; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 01:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Eduard Metz <>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 10:22:25 +0200
Message-ID: <>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <>
Cc: "" <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001ded9805c8cb9f39"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 08:22:45 -0000

    Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for
    compressing SRv6 information?



On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 8:52 PM Joel M. Halpern <> wrote:

> The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts
> on the requirements and analysis drafts.  The question of how the
> working group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic
> for a separate email a bit later.
> Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and
> the perspectives being expressed.  While the topic was well-raised, the
> discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to
> everyone what the purpose is.  In particular, the chairs have decided to
> re-ask the question.  We ask that even those who have responded in the
> discussion respond to this thread.  Preferably with both what their
> opinion is and an explanation of why.
> The question we are asking you to comment on is:
> Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for
> compressing SRv6 information?
> Please speak up.  We are looking to collect responses until close of
> business PDT on 20-August-2021.
> Thank you,
> Joel, Jim, and Bruno
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list