[spring] 回复: SRv6 SID List compression

"苏远超(以泰)" <yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com> Tue, 03 August 2021 09:57 UTC

Return-Path: <yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295593A1C6C; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 02:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alibaba-inc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id US1UdXR8aFgT; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 02:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out0-150.mail.aliyun.com (out0-150.mail.aliyun.com [140.205.0.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BDA13A1C65; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 02:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alibaba-inc.com; s=default; t=1627984662; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=8gR6U03RmYOaky1rcZlAo+MuCwdyYsajcWE2A+014AU=; b=fWENjZSEGb3CPWcxzmXw8o5qTndavzn7yaPAtfWiG6+egJFq3PAvGyTtAqN19vjhDAcl9Odgg6fUfa8a+cTr4wUNiXDtHYLgVSxoqV/YwIrjNXgTjJLlzDVbQc+u14v8/MsrE2qi72cqU942dmvRumjhqokHljz/qDk8spMY6yE=
X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R191e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; DS=||; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=ay29a033018047208; MF=yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com; NM=1; PH=DW; RN=2; SR=0; TI=W4_0.1.10_DEFAULT_0AB100A3_1627983739129_o7001c297e;
Received: from WS-web (yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com[W4_0.1.10_DEFAULT_0AB100A3_1627983739129_o7001c297e]) by ay29a011140100218.et135 at Tue, 03 Aug 2021 17:57:41 +0800
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 17:57:41 +0800
From: "苏远超(以泰)" <yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com>
To: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>, spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org>
Reply-To: "苏远超(以泰)" <yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com>
Message-ID: <7e3c6a2e-62e4-4b2b-a103-ab339100a792.yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com>
X-Mailer: [Alimail-Mailagent revision 2546561][W4_0.1.10][DEFAULT][Chrome]
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BN6PR11MB40817B5D7BDE6A15735F3A92C8E89@BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-aliyun-mail-creator: W4_0.1.10_DEFAULT_M3LTW96aWxsYS81LjAgKE1hY2ludG9zaDsgSW50ZWwgTWFjIE9TIFggMTBfMTVfNSkgQXBwbGVXZWJLaXQvNTM3LjM2IChLSFRNTCwgbGlrZSBHZWNrbykgQ2hyb21lLzgxLjAuNDA0NC4xMzggU2FmYXJpLzUzNy4zNg==vN
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR11MB40817B5D7BDE6A15735F3A92C8E89@BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=ALIBOUNDARY_34726_7fcc06769700_61091315_21e8f0e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/1J1fWZzK-fXTWb1w6YMUZUjSs4o>
Subject: [spring] 回复: SRv6 SID List compression
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 09:57:53 -0000

Hi Spring WG,
 DT team have done a great job in the past one year, I believe the analysis is complete and correct.
   As I expressed in previous emails, Alibaba have been looking forward to the consolided SID compression solution which would be benefical to the whole industry, that's why we co-author draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression to drive consensus.
   I think WG should proceed with adoption CSID. 
   Thanks.

              Yuanchao Su
              Alicloud Network Architect Director

 
------------------------------------------------------------------
发件人:Darren Dukes (ddukes) <ddukes=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
发送时间:2021年7月27日(星期二) 05:53
收件人:SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
主 题:[spring] SRv6 SID List compression


I’ll paraphrase what I said in the call...

Today the design team presented analysis of proposals to compress an SRv6 SID list.
They spent a year building the requirements and completing the analysis, in depth, with unanimous consensus.
The CSID proposal satisfied all the requirements to the largest degree of any proposal.
That proposal has multiple implementations, and interoperability, noted in the draft.
That proposal has a large set of SPRING participants working on it already.

The problem of SRv6 SID list compression is solved, CSID is ready for adoption.

I hope we can conclude this, and choose a single proposal for WG adoption.

Darren