[spring] 回复: WG Adoption call - draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement - draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis

"苏远超(以泰)" <yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com> Thu, 16 September 2021 02:13 UTC

Return-Path: <yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA503A0883; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 19:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alibaba-inc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GBJOj-rHJ207; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 19:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out0-139.mail.aliyun.com (out0-139.mail.aliyun.com [140.205.0.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 335383A087D; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 19:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alibaba-inc.com; s=default; t=1631758381; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=PQ7IveXbt0KpbqUYQWMtbr1wbOUhxT+UKFDBFUXPH7A=; b=jLSAT+EYNoAbLxrwhrDKquCWMUJP/j4wRYGR/zWSOS1UOl2bGcDH6PMK7ZYziXBGK87+qW0Mik/wkdQMPZRlLoVPC1sjvIvRV7ZxR6+tTzbvEWml9isFzc2zbULutjS6EwRL13QLANMSppK+Pp1r9UQI9Tu/D6IMmeg8NomA4Zs=
X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R141e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; DS=||; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=ay29a033018047188; MF=yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com; NM=1; PH=DW; RN=2; SR=0; TI=W4_0.1.10_DEFAULT_0AB10212_1631758082246_o7001c136r;
Received: from WS-web (yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com[W4_0.1.10_DEFAULT_0AB10212_1631758082246_o7001c136r]) by ay29a011140100240.et135 at Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:13:00 +0800
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:13:00 +0800
From: "苏远超(以泰)" <yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com>
To: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org>
Reply-To: "苏远超(以泰)" <yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com>
Message-ID: <54ae0ea0-8454-407e-acd0-4cfc5e9a1a60.yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com>
X-Mailer: [Alimail-Mailagent revision 2][W4_0.1.10][DEFAULT][Chrome]
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <15436_1631020356_61376544_15436_364_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A4CE99E43@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
x-aliyun-mail-creator: W4_0.1.10_DEFAULT_M3LTW96aWxsYS81LjAgKE1hY2ludG9zaDsgSW50ZWwgTWFjIE9TIFggMTBfMTVfNSkgQXBwbGVXZWJLaXQvNTM3LjM2IChLSFRNTCwgbGlrZSBHZWNrbykgQ2hyb21lLzgxLjAuNDA0NC4xMzggU2FmYXJpLzUzNy4zNg==vN
In-Reply-To: <15436_1631020356_61376544_15436_364_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A4CE99E43@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=ALIBOUNDARY_52678_7f00b7f9a700_6142a82c_dea52"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/1uDt-L9OBsBM_yoJSjz0eCQCYVE>
Subject: [spring] 回复: WG Adoption call - draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement - draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 02:13:12 -0000

Hi WG,

   I support the WG adoption of the two documents.
   CSID has one dataplane with 2 flavors, and quite a few inter-op tests are done to verify the design and quite a few vendors/ASIC have implemented CSID. So I think it's right time to proceed with these two documents.
   Thanks!

  Yuanchao Su
  Alicloud Network Director

------------------------------------------------------------------
发件人:bruno.decraene <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
发送时间:2021年9月7日(星期二) 21:12
收件人:spring@ietf.org <spring@ietf.org>
主 题:[spring] WG Adoption call - draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement - draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis


Dear WG,


The Design Team has produced two documents:
- A requirement document: draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement 
- A solution analysis document: draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis

Both have been presented to the WG and triggered some discussions but are still individual documents.
We believe it's now time for the WG to consider taking ownership of those two documents.
Note that, especially for those two documents, WG adoption does not necessarily mean RFC publication in particular if it turns out that the benefit of long term archive would not justify the WG and IESG effort to finalize those two documents.


This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call, ending September  20th 2021, for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis


After review of the document(s) please indicate support (or not) for WG adoption of the document(s) to the mailing list.
Please also provide comments/reasons for your support (or lack thereof) as this is a stronger way to indicate your (non) support as this is not a vote.

If you are willing to work on the document(s), please state this explicitly. This gives the chairs an indication of the energy level of people in the working group willing to work on the document. 

Thanks!

Jim, Bruno & Joel

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.