IETF Logo Mail Archive

[spring] Re: Shepherd review for draft-ietf-spring-bfd-10

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 06 September 2024 21:05 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7614C14F5FB; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 14:05:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e8M1Ppr1ZiKR; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 14:05:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61655C14F5EC; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 14:05:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-7c1324be8easo2549182a12.1; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 14:05:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1725656748; x=1726261548; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=f7u81CDLOHo+44qWFCOQKy2bixo/1k21SAKjaLSOutw=; b=HvSjrWCQRNZ7UT8VATe1Lqzqpr7bdxf07Q+VsEw6+WZ7uaO+jRIZotNuhDk/aT8Pr+ NLCNUfzaLyvq7msJDxbFlitqwWCOJ+i0xIBz0tKyB5HXbybUGeygiAkf4JXtG4oLhIZz LAhp4bC0cOR030RxXLGh8m7LgQu0eNaHqW4ytBKeVP1sP9E0O58aiO6CEwcjn/ITHiSn yzeQhzPiTvgPs4yp4Cx/51leLbxSrZnH45jY+twNiRYKWMAABxve7VnVYllpeI+MBC4H tfvY5u1yq3J3Q19PTRZw7Z1Gq8/uWbC4CPPJr85p74OhbMb4POHl6lay3P5tgh9GXEt/ KzLg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725656748; x=1726261548; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=f7u81CDLOHo+44qWFCOQKy2bixo/1k21SAKjaLSOutw=; b=Mcx2go2t30JcQzUDy0RWSvhXP0JDCrpM5V5CN5F2TjomkcH003oEB5KxooOzCgcUl7 YEGo7hWaDLJkWoeXTP+cjApUVhM5/VvEPB9Gcd3MHWozBjJbiQsN2kjRVrNeixMpx8yw MUqkZnUtyrsJ3otVlYAd0zBEJ+yVF6t+lbICQDbQmqSb1R8WTqN/On5J7RCKXMIPVRL9 dXDFQ0BVb4NRbfxVDwM4pA+EBfXEvUVjBD7o76DkCGg51xXSslNKAokb6bAXxgeIxn6O GiSGxSy947tuPT5kiO14agGEBbrrB64t158Xi76QHu7dWDxD6ItNQ69hAqOQ+OhDw7F3 FSSQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUGmz3k72chkjwxqNtdQXPeFeQy90SE22rzUUqIS0q1Q4EZnK1RL/qSqEWUn88DMDuo5hHfn+gFgmtpMh6vek/OJuRYAUg=@ietf.org, AJvYcCXhesdAmTzFZyOPly0IeW/b8aeoivUpsbdO95X7rZUUnFMP2wMPwD6HYH0C0ktqGdB5xzqZK7uv@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxlMrDcYQ3GNJRSzKuvP+iCKGpvTvB8yTaMv4rI1AzXVcTgvWZ/ bS+u8epVKWwY5U0oCCKnMMEC5+bBLu4+5fjTyrzcG0uIYvFcUpkt8lCX878gyoCZk0Hag3QuFDu yXuAWfK0gIM9aDXnfQDlETlLWkRs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE7/6SG1w+GJo0CoAb9W4Dvg551XZY+E51A9Oz1z6BU09CiCK195+bWh3u4Ob9qcBFo4snxDQfKsA6xYod/Ww8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1647:b0:2da:5863:fdbd with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2da8f302291mr15853110a91.17.1725656747557; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 14:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 14:05:46 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmX33Shp7V+zpyC7Ht6PB=mBDXvjr5KdsAG9tsMzEZk_Fg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH6gdPyNGPnpsHp=YBfmHQfaO24anrLgT__55SDbULz=-7_=sQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+RyBmX33Shp7V+zpyC7Ht6PB=mBDXvjr5KdsAG9tsMzEZk_Fg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 14:05:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsyCRWP1hDgGGOwXKSPkKFdOG+tnOsXmtj48v0=g9hit3Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID-Hash: J2SFOI3RPNU67I2RBD32JUBJ4O7I7QKW
X-Message-ID-Hash: J2SFOI3RPNU67I2RBD32JUBJ4O7I7QKW
X-MailFrom: aretana.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spring.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: spring Chairs <spring-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-spring-bfd@ietf.org, SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [spring] Re: Shepherd review for draft-ietf-spring-bfd-10
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG (SPRING)" <spring.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/2HA0u8Zg5BS9L5uJR5xQoxhb7bs>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spring-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spring-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spring-leave@ietf.org>

On August 28, 2024 at 7:31:23 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote:

Greg:

Hi!


...
> > 516 12. Security Considerations
> >
> > 518 Security considerations discussed in [RFC5880], [RFC5884], [RFC7726],
> > 519 and [RFC8029] apply to this document.
> >
> > < minor > I think some more text would be required here to cover SR
> > specific aspects? Right now, it is only BFD specific.
>
> GIM>> Added the reference to RFC 9256. Would you suggest additional
> references?

I would like to see text explaining why no other considerations,
specific to what is being specified in this document, are needed.

For example, something along the lines of: "This document describes A,
B, and C.  These new mechanisms only add XXX, so there's no risk of
additional security issues..."  [Just making this up!]


Also, the Intended Status of this document is "Experimental".  Please
include a section about what you expect the experiment to be -- what
you expect implementations to experiment with -- what do you expect to
learn -- how will you know if the experiment is successful?


Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status