Re: [spring] [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt - 1 week extension [10/14 to 10/21/2019]

<> Fri, 18 October 2019 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA002120115; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 02:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fd-viisXiqvZ; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 02:16:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DB7712003F; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 02:16:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 290A37C5C52400A4D0DA; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:13:25 +0800 (CST)
Received: from ([]) by with SMTP id x9I9COfE003360; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:12:24 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from
Received: from mapi (njxapp03[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:12:23 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:12:23 +0800 (CST)
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afb5da981f72a1cdf99
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: <>
To: <>, <>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: x9I9COfE003360
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [spring] =?utf-8?q?=5BIdr=5D_Adoption=3A_draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-?= =?utf-8?q?policy-path-segment-03=2Etxt_and_draft-li-sr-policy-path-segmen?= =?utf-8?q?t-01=2Etxt_-_1_week_extension_=5B10/14_to_10/21/2019=5D?=
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:16:44 -0000

Dear WG,

I Support the adoption.
I think the BGP extension of path segment is another option for configuration instead of draft-ietf-pce-path-segment.
And the BGP-LS extension is reasonable for configuring the SR policy with path segment.


<<Re: [spring] [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt - 1 week extension [10/14 to 10/21/2019]
"Susan Hares" <> Mon, 14 October 2019 18:12 UTCShow header

Greetings IDR and Spring WG


The WG Adoption for the two IDR drafts related to IDR received a level
support below the threshold to accept this draft into the IDR WG. There
were no objection, but there was simply a low level of response. 


This 1 week extension to the Adoption call is to let the members of both the
IDR and SPRING WG comment on whether these drafts have matured enough to be
IDR WG drafts. On 10/21/2019, the IDR chairs will make a determination of
whether either of these two drafts have enough support to be accepted. 


Thank you, Susan Hares

IDR co-chair 


From: Idr [] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 12:35 PM
To: 'idr wg'
Subject: [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt
and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt [9/17 to 10/1/2019]


This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call two related drafts [9/17 to 10/1/2019]

. draft-li-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and 

. draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt. 


You can access these two drafts at the following location: